PAGES
← all tools
◆ SAST / SCA / Code Security

Corridor

commercial

Corridor injects codebase-specific guardrails into Cursor, Claude Code and Codex, scans changes before commit, reviews pull requests and enforces merge policy.

Summary

Corridor is a commercial appsec platform that attaches a pre-commit security layer to AI coding agents such as Devin, Codex, Claude Code and Cursor Cloud Agents, installing a CLI and a git hook in each cloud session that scans staged changes and blocks commits containing security findings. Teams attach their own context to a project, in the form of named notes or uploaded documents, so guardrails judge code against organization-specific rules rather than generic patterns, and findings can be exported as SARIFSARIFStatic Analysis Results Interchange Format, a standard for sharing code-analysis findings, including locations and rule details. It lets scanners report results to a common review interface. for ingestion by tools like Wiz. It is aimed at application security teams supporting AI-assisted development rather than at developers working unassisted, and sits in the emerging space of security tooling built specifically around AI coding agents rather than traditional static analysis. Corridor launched in 2025, so there is little track record yet to judge its pace of development.

Corridor injects codebase-specific guardrails into Cursor, Claude Code and Codex, scans changes before commit, reviews pull requests and enforces merge policy.

How Corridor helps

Which security rules will an AI coding agent follow while it is generating code in this repo?

injects codebase-specific guardrails directly into the coding agent's context, so the rules it writes against reflect this project rather than a generic checklist

Does the code an agent just wrote introduce a vulnerability before it is ever committed?

analyzes the generated code in real time against those guardrails and flags issues at the point of creation, not after the fact

What security problems does a pull request introduce, and how do I fix them?

scans every pull request for security issues and posts findings with remediation guidance directly on the pull request

Is this pull request allowed to merge?

enforces merge policy across the pull request based on the security findings it turns up, so unresolved issues block the merge rather than passing through review

all 7 features, with the evidence for each →

Languages

Not documented

Features

7 capabilities

Built from Corridor's releases, docs, README and our own runs. “Seen” marks the month we first spotted a release the vendor didn't date. Group names and tags are our labels.

Compare with peers →

  • Corridor covers 1 of the 8 vulnerability assessment methods capabilities we track.

What Corridor offers you

  • Role-based access control2
  • Single sign-on2
  • JSON data export1
All capabilities 7 capabilities
Pre-commit security scanning via cloud agent integrations documented Integrates with cloud environments behind AI coding agents (such as Claude Code, Devin, Codex, and Cursor) to install a CLI and pre-commit hook that scans staged changes and blocks commits containing security findings. 11 other sources · first seen Sep 2026

Shared capability: Static application security testing

docs 11 total

  • - [Cursor](https://docs.corridor.dev/long-running-agents/cursor.md): Set up Corridor with Cursor Cloud Agents to scan code for security vulnerabilities before every commit. seen Sep 2026 · source
  • Corridor integrates with the cloud environments behind Claude Code on the web and Claude Tag , Anthropic’s @Claude in Slack, to catch security vulnerabilities before code is committed. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
  • Corridor integrates with Devin to catch security vulnerabilities before code is committed. When configured, your Devin environment installs the Corridor CLI and a git pre-commit hook that scans staged changes and blocks commits containing security findings. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
  • Corridor integrates with Cursor Cloud Agents to catch security vulnerabilities before code is committed. When configured, every agent session installs the Corridor CLI and a git pre-commit hook that scans staged changes and blocks commits containing security findings. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
  • Corridor integrates with Codex cloud environments to catch security vulnerabilities before code is committed. When configured, every cloud session installs the Corridor CLI and a git pre-commit hook that scans staged changes and blocks commits containing security findings. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
  • Corridor integrates with Codex cloud environments to catch security vulnerabilities before code is committed. When configured, every cloud session installs the Corridor CLI and a git pre-commit hook that scans staged changes and blocks commits containing security findings. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
AI coding agent steering documented Guides AI coding assistants with project-specific security context and guardrails before they generate code. 2 other sources · first seen Oct 2026

docs

  • tool delivers Corridor Agent Steering . AI coding assistants call it before generating code. It takes a description of what you plan to implement and returns relevant security context from your project’s guardrails and context documents. docs update · Oct 2026 · source
  • Corridor Agent Steering guides AI coding agents with project-specific security guidance before they write code. When you use Claude Code, Cursor, or another supported agent, Corridor guides the agent using the relevant guardrails and context documents, and the agent writes safer code from the start. docs update · Oct 2026 · source
Contextual knowledge for guardrails documented suggested Allows attaching named notes or uploaded documents to a project so that guardrail analysis considers the organization's specific context. 2 other sources · first seen Sep 2026

Suggested capability: Static application security testing. This is our guess, not confirmed.

docs

  • Guardrail Maintenance Keep existing guardrails accurate, add coverage for new product surface, and retire true duplicates. Build or refresh a repository threat model and store it as a Corridor context item. Guardrail Maintenance writes and updates guardrails. writes a context item named Repository Threat Model. seen Oct 2026 · source
  • Context Context is your own knowledge, added to Corridor so guardrails analyze code with your organization in mind. A context is a named note or uploaded document that you attach to a project. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
Role-based access control documented Provides distinct permission levels for team members, including a read-only viewer role that can access projects, findings, and guardrails but cannot modify data or view other members' chats. 2 other sources

Also counts toward: Role-based access control

docs

  • Read-only access to projects, findings, and guardrails in the dashboard and MCP, plus on their own chats. No team dashboards. Cannot change anything or read other members’ chats seen Oct 2026 · source
  • Read-only access to projects, findings, and guardrails in the dashboard and MCP, plus on their own chats. No team dashboards. Cannot change anything or read other members’ chats seen Oct 2026 · source
SARIF export documented Exports team findings as a SARIF 2.1.0 document via an API endpoint for ingestion by external tools. 1 other source · first seen Sep 2026

Also counts toward: JSON data export

docs

  • Export findings as SARIF (Beta) GET /teams/:id/findings/sarif This endpoint is in beta. Its parameters and response format can change. Returns your team’s findings as a SARIF 2.1.0 document, served as application/sarif+json . You can send it as-is to any tool that ingests SARIF, such as Wiz. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
SSO with Microsoft Entra ID documented Allows enterprise accounts to authenticate users via single sign-on using Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD). 1 other source

Also counts toward: Single sign-on

docs

  • - [SSO & Microsoft Entra ID](https://docs.corridor.dev/administration/sso-microsoft-entra.md): Set up single sign-on with Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) for your Corridor enterprise account. This documentation is built and hosted on [Mintlify](https://mintlify.com), a developer documentation platform. seen Oct 2026 · source
SSO with Okta documented Allows enterprise accounts to authenticate users via single sign-on using Okta, creating accounts automatically on first sign-in and assigning roles based on invitation or domain membership. 1 other source

Also counts toward: Role-based access control, Single sign-on

docs

  • How users are managed Users sign in with Okta. Corridor creates their account on first sign-in. If you invited someone, they get the role you chose. Everyone else on your verified domain joins as a Standard User When someone leaves, remove them on the Corridor Teams page too. seen Oct 2026 · source

Lines in monospace are the tool's own words: help text parsed from its source, or an endpoint from its API document. Under release, a line is our summary of a dated release. Under docs, it is quoted from the tool's own documentation or website. Each links back to the source it came from.

Command line

5 commands for Corridor, each with where it came from. This tool has no source analysis yet, so there is no option reference and no captured run beside them.

Source

Score card

  1. Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
  2. Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
  3. Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
  4. Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
  5. Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface

Five scores for Corridor, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.

Score cards are part of every paid plan.

See plans →

Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.

How this is scored
  • Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
  • Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
  • Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
  • Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
  • Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
  • Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
  • Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
  • Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.

Release-note detail over time

See how much detail Corridor puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.

Checking release-note history…

Explore the full chart →

Website history

corridor.dev, every change

Corridor's home and pricing pages and 1 more page as they looked each month from March 2025 to October 2026: 9 renders, 4 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.

Website history is included with Researcher and Business.

See plans →

Releases

14 entries

  1. October 20263
  2. September 202611

    14 entries

    Add the badge to your README

    Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.

    Tracked by Cyber Toolchain Choose a badge style and copy the code →
    browse all tools → score card for your toolchain →