Ettercap
v0.8.4 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on Ettercap's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Comprehensive suite for man-in-the-middle attacks featuring live connection sniffing, content filtering, and active/passive protocol dissection.
ettercap -G --plugin-list 'plugin1,plugin2' cmake -DGTK_BUILD_TYPE=gtk3 .. etterfilter -e myrules.ef myfilter.ec cmake .. -DINSTALL_EXEDIR=/opt/custom/bin && make install
Summary
Ettercap is an open-source suite for man-in-the-middle attacks, distributed free under its own license terms and run as a command-line tool (with optional GTKGTKA cross-platform widget toolkit maintained by the GNOME project for building graphical user interfaces in C, with bindings for many languages, giving cyber tools a native desktop UI without writing platform-specific rendering code. or ncurses interfaces built from source). It sniffs live connections, dissects both active and passive network protocols, and applies content filtering on the fly through a custom filter language that includes scripting functions like random value generation. This puts it in the hands of penetration testers and network analysts who need to intercept, inspect, or manipulate traffic on a network segment, rather than end users or SOCSOCA security operations center, the team or function that monitors threats, investigates alerts and coordinates incident response. Its work can be internal, outsourced or shared. teams doing passive monitoring. It sits within the broader network-analysis category alongside other packet-capture and interception tools, built on libraries like libpcap and libnet. With its first commit dating to 2003, 88 contributors, and 42 commits in the past year across 7 releases, the project remains actively maintained.
Comprehensive suite for man-in-the-middle attacks featuring live connection sniffing, content filtering, and active/passive protocol dissection.
How Ettercap helps
Which hosts on this network segment are talking to each other and over what protocols?
sniffs live connections and dissects both active and passive protocols, showing the traffic passing across the segment rather than just what a host advertises
Can traffic between two hosts be redirected through this machine for inspection?
performs the man-in-the-middle positioning itself, putting the sniffed connections in reach of its filtering and dissection engine
What is actually inside a connection as it flows across the wire, not just its headers?
dissects the protocol content live and applies the custom filter language to inspect and manipulate packet data on the fly
Has a target's geolocation data changed since switching lookup libraries?
resolves host geolocation through the libmaxminddb-based lookup that replaced the older GeoIP API, so lookups reflect the current database format rather than the retired one
Does the SSL redirect list need a restart to pick up a newly added HTTPS target?
the GTK interface can refresh the SSL redirect list mid-session, so newly targeted hosts are covered without restarting the capture
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for Ettercap, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Ettercap puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
6 entries
No entries match these filters.
- February 20261
- August 20201
- July 20191
- March 20151
- October 20141
- September 20131
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in Ettercap/ettercap, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 5 +1 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 2 +2 joined · −1 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 2 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 6.7 days first maintainer reply 20 hours
- Open backlog 114 of 679 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 1 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 114
- Contributors / month 1
- Commits / month 6
- Stars 2,789
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Articles
2 articles · updated Nov 4, 2026Where Ettercap turns up in what others publish: how-tos, attack reports that name it, and incident write-ups. A row says why it is here and quotes where the article names it; the link goes to the publisher.
Tutorials & guides 2
-
Session Hijacking using Ettercap, Hamster and Ferret (A Beginner Guide)
First of all, login to Kali Linux and select ettercap .
-
Hack Remote PC using Fake Updates Scam with Ettercap and Metasploit
Move to etc /ettercap directory.
1 more quote
ettercap –i eth0 –T –q –P dns_spoof -M ARP /192.168.0.103.// It will activate dns_spoof plug-in.
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.