PAGES
← all tools
◆ Compliance Automation & Trust Management

Fortreum

commercial

Summary

Fortreum is a commercial compliance-automation cyber tool that helps cloud providers, defense contractors, and enterprises achieve compliance with confidence. It is run as a service and is aimed at cloud providers, defense contractors, and enterprises. Its documentation positions it alongside other FedRAMPFedRAMPA US government program that standardizes cloud security authorization, letting vendors get a single assessment accepted across federal agencies instead of repeating the process for each one. 3PAOs. The tool supports compliance assessment for standards including CMMC and FedRAMP, and has seen 11 releases in the tracked period, with the most recent one this week.

How Fortreum helps

Where does this environment actually stand against CMMC or FedRAMP requirements today?

assesses the current control set against the target standard and reports which controls are met, partial, or missing, with the gap tied to the specific requirement it fails

What would an assessor flag before the official audit starts?

runs the same assessment approach used in formal 3PAO evaluation, surfacing the findings that would otherwise surface for the first time during the real audit

Which of these gaps are worth fixing before the next assessment window?

ranks findings against the target standard's requirements so remediation effort goes to the controls actually blocking certification, not cosmetic issues

Is this cloud environment ready to put in front of a FedRAMP assessor?

measures the environment against FedRAMP's control baseline and reports readiness as a status per control family, rather than a single pass or fail

Has anything drifted out of compliance since the last assessment?

re-runs the control assessment and compares the new result set against the prior one, naming the controls whose status changed

Languages

Not documented

Score card

  1. Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
  2. Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
  3. Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
  4. Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
  5. Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface

Five scores for Fortreum, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.

Score cards are part of every paid plan.

See plans →

Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.

How this is scored
  • Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
  • Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
  • Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
  • Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
  • Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
  • Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
  • Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
  • Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.

Release-note detail over time

See how much detail Fortreum puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.

Checking release-note history…

Explore the full chart →

Website history

fortreum.com, every change

Fortreum's home page and 29 more pages as they looked each month from September 2021 to October 2026: 41 renders, 5 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.

Website history is included with Researcher and Business.

See plans →

Releases

Nothing shipped since we started watching. Releases and docs updates land here as they happen.

last release Sep 29, 2026 · watching since Jul 27, 2026

Add the badge to your README

Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.

Tracked by Cyber Toolchain Choose a badge style and copy the code →
browse all tools → score card for your toolchain →