FOSSA
commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on FOSSA's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
FOSSA secures the software supply chainsoftware supply chainThe dependencies, tools and processes used to build and deliver software. Compromising one part can affect the products or organizations that rely on it. with automated SBOMSBOMA software bill of materials, an inventory of the components and versions inside an application. It helps teams find affected software when a dependency has a vulnerability or licensing issue. generation, software composition analysissoftware composition analysisSoftware composition analysis, identifying third-party dependencies and checking them for known vulnerabilities and license issues. It covers software a team uses rather than writes itself., license compliance, and vulnerability management.
curl -X POST "https://app.fossa.com/hooks/webhook/sbom%2B58760%2Fmy-project" curl -X GET "https://analysis.fossa.com/api/v1/cpe/match/cpe%3A2.3%3Aa%3Aapache%3Alog4j%3A2.14.1%3A*%3A*%3A*%3A*%3A*%3A*%3A*?reverse-wildcard=true" -H 'accept: application/json' curl -g "https://analysis.fossa.com/api/v1/cpe/match/%5B%22cpe:2.3:a:apache:log4j:2.14.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*%22,%22cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:internet_explorer:8.0.6001:beta:*:*:*:*:*:*%22%5D/id" -H 'accept: application/json'
Summary
FOSSA is a commercial application security tool that secures the software supply chain by automating SBOM generation, conducting software composition analysis, enforcing open source license compliance, and managing vulnerabilities. The product is designed for platform engineers and sits in the supply-chain-security space, performing functions similar to tools focused on software bill of materialssoftware bill of materialsA software bill of materials, an inventory of the components and versions inside an application. It helps teams find affected software when a dependency has a vulnerability or licensing issue.. It runs as a service, and the platform has seen 15 releases in the tracked window.
FOSSA secures the software supply chain with automated SBOM generation, software composition analysis, license compliance, and vulnerability management.
How FOSSA helps
Which open source licenses are my dependencies bringing in, and do any violate policy?
scans every dependency to detect its license, checks it against the compliance policy assigned to the project, and flags violations as issues with the obligation attached
Which of my dependencies have known vulnerabilities, and which ones need attention first?
matches dependencies against CVE data and surfaces them as tracked issues that can be prioritized and pushed into a remediation workflow
Can I produce a software bill of materials for this project right now?
generates an SBOM from the current dependency scan and exports it in the format the requester needs
Are my projects actually enforcing the rules I've defined, or just the ones I checked by hand?
applies policies defined once for licenses, vulnerabilities, and quality across every project automatically, so violations show up as issues without a manual review pass
Which dependencies are healthy versus poorly maintained?
scores each dependency on quality and maintenance signals so unhealthy or abandoned packages are visible before they cause a problem
What do I hand legal when they ask for compliance evidence?
produces attribution notices and scheduled compliance or security reports pulled directly from the scan data
Languages
Command line
6 commands for FOSSA, each with where it came from. This tool has no source analysis yet, so there is no option reference and no captured run beside them.
No command matches.
Screenshots
From the release notes, newest first. Click one to see it full size.Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for FOSSA, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail FOSSA puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Commercials
pricing & packaging history · FOSSA vendor page35 readings of FOSSA's pricing page since Jul 2022, with 4 relaunches of its plan lineup and 7 changes to what its plans include — each one dated, compared with the reading before it, and explained for someone buying the tool.
Pricing and packaging history is included with Researcher and Business. See how every vendor we track sells, and how that has changed over time, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Plans by offering
Each offering on the pricing page links to its own page of plans, read at its latest capture.
Plan relaunches
Plans, prices and descriptions are quoted from the vendor's own pricing page as we read it on each date. A plan missing from a later reading is shown as no longer listed on the page — a statement about the page, not the product. Readings that failed to show any plans are left out rather than read as a change.
Website history
fossa.com, every changeFOSSA's home page and 14 more pages as they looked each month from August 2021 to October 2026: 24 renders, 5 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
3 entries
No entries match these filters.
- October 20261
- September 20262
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.