GRR
v.4.0.0.0-release open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on GRR's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Incident response framework with a Python agent installed on target systems and server infrastructure for remote live forensics.
curl -X GET https://<grr-server>/api/v2/clients/<client_id>/flows?top_flows_only=false \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer <token>'
Summary
GRR is an open-source incident response framework, free to use, built for remote live forensics on endpoint systems. It runs as a python agent installed on target machines paired with python server infrastructure that manages and communicates with those clients, so adoption means standing up and operating that server yourself rather than installing a local tool. It's aimed at incident responders and forensic analysts who need to inspect and collect evidence from fleets of remote machines rather than a single workstation. It sits in the DFIRDFIRDigital forensics and incident response, investigating what happened during a security incident and containing it. The work includes preserving evidence, reconstructing activity and restoring systems. space, alongside other remote-forensics and endpoint-investigation frameworks, though its own documentation doesn't name specific peers. Started in 2011 and still active, with 68 contributors and 32 commits in the past year, though its most recent release was 249 days ago.
Incident response framework with a Python agent installed on target systems and server infrastructure for remote live forensics.
How GRR helps
Which of my machines are compromised right now, and what's running on them?
queries the agent on each endpoint live and returns processes, network connections and open files as they stand at the moment of collection, not from a snapshot taken earlier
Which hosts across my fleet have a given malicious file or registry key on disk?
dispatches the same search across all selected endpoints in parallel and reports back per-host hits, so a fleet-wide sweep replaces logging into machines one at a time
What changed on this endpoint between two points in time?
pulls filesystem and process state directly from the agent on demand, so an analyst can compare collections taken at different moments instead of trusting a single static image
Who was logged into this machine, and what did they run?
collects the live artifacts on the endpoint through the same agent-server pipeline used for other sweeps, returning results centrally rather than requiring shell access to the box
Where else in my organization has this same indicator shown up?
runs one collection request against the whole managed fleet rather than a single workstation, returning matches host by host from the server that manages all the agents
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for GRR, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail GRR puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Website history
adk.dev, every changeGoogle's 40 pages as they looked each month from August 2026 to October 2026: 79 renders, 1 change of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
8 entries
No entries match these filters.
- December 20251
- April 20251
- February 20251
- June 20241
- May 20241
- October 20231
- June 20161
- April 20151
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in google/grr, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 3 −1 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 1 +1 joined · −3 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 1 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 17 days first maintainer reply 17 days
- Open backlog 141 of 686 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 141
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 5,089
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.