inspectrum
v0.4.0 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on inspectrum's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
inspectrum is a tool for analysing captured signals, primarily from software-defined radio receivers.
Summary
inspectrum is an open-source desktop application for analysing signals captured from software-defined radio receivers, free to use and run locally as a Qt-based GUIGUIA graphical user interface, controls such as windows, buttons and menus. It lets people use software visually rather than entering commands. on Linux, macOS, or Windows. It reads large captures (100GB+) in formats like SigMF, GNU Radio's cfile, and vendor-specific formats from HackRF, BladeRF, and RTLRTLRegister Transfer Level, a hardware design abstraction describing how data moves between registers each clock cycle; cyber tools use it to analyze or synthesize digital circuits from HDL source.-SDR, presenting a zoomable spectrogram alongside amplitude, frequency, phase, and IQ plots, with cursors for measuring symbol rate and extracting symbols for export. This makes it a fit for RF engineers and signal-intelligence researchers doing manual, visual analysis of captured traffic rather than automated decoding pipelines. It sits in the SDR signal-analysis space alongside general tools like GNU Radio and Universal Radio Hacker, though it focuses narrowly on inspection rather than transmission or protocol reversing. First committed in 2015 and still maintained, with 42 contributors and a release roughly eight months ago.
inspectrum is a tool for analysing captured signals, primarily from software-defined radio receivers.
How inspectrum helps
Where in this capture does a signal of interest actually start and stop?
the zoomable, pannable spectrogram lets you scan across hours of samples visually and pinpoint the exact time range, without decoding anything first
What is the symbol rate of this unknown transmission?
cursors placed across repeating features in the amplitude or frequency plot measure the period directly off the waveform, giving a rate you can feed into a demodulator later
Is this modulation ASK, FSK, or something with phase shifts?
the amplitude, frequency, phase, and IQ plots of the same selection are viewed side by side, so the shape that jumps out under each view points to the modulation family
Can this multi-gigabyte capture from my SDR be opened without running out of memory?
files are read from disk rather than loaded wholesale, so 100GB+ recordings in SigMF, cfile, or vendor formats from HackRF, BladeRF, and RTL-SDR open and scroll without exhausting RAM
What are the actual bits behind this burst I've isolated?
symbol cursors laid across the selected region extract the underlying symbols for export, turning a visual pattern into data for further decoding
Which segment of this recording is worth exporting for a colleague or another tool?
a selected time span, filtered samples, or demodulated data can be exported on its own, rather than handing over the entire original capture
Languages
Command line
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for inspectrum, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail inspectrum puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
3 entries
No entries match these filters.
- December 20251
- December 20201
- February 20171
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in miek/inspectrum, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 1 ±0 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 1 +1 joined · −0 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 1 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 149 days issues closed, last 12 months
- Open backlog 45 of 143 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 45
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 2,512
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.