princeprocessor
v0.21 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on princeprocessor's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Standalone password candidate generator using the PRINCE algorithm - hashcat/princeprocessor
princeprocessor --case-permute input.txt > output.txt princeprocessor --input wordlist.txt --skip 0xdeadbeef princeprocessor --input wordlist.txt --limit 0xff
Summary
princeprocessor is an open-source password candidate generator that implements the PRINCE algorithm, building chains of one or more words from a single input wordlist rather than combining two separate lists like a traditional combinator attack. It costs nothing to use and runs as a command-line tool, compiled from source or installed from prebuilt Linux, Windows and macOS binaries. It is aimed at password auditors and penetration testers who feed its output into cracking tools such as hashcat rather than at general system administrators. Its README frames it as a standalone counterpart to hashcat's combinator attack, generating candidate lists that hashcat or similar crackers then consume. First committed in 2015 and built up by 8 contributors across 7 tracked releases, the project has seen no commits in the past year, so treat it as stable but no longer actively maintained.
Standalone password candidate generator using the PRINCE algorithm - hashcat/princeprocessor
How princeprocessor helps
Which candidate passwords would a two-wordlist combinator attack never produce from my existing wordlist?
chains one to many words from the single input wordlist together in every ordering and split, so it covers concatenations a paired-wordlist combinator run would miss
How do I extend my cracking coverage without building a second wordlist?
takes only the one wordlist already on hand and reassembles its entries into multi-word chains of the target length, standing in for the second list a combinator attack would otherwise need
What candidate stream do I feed into hashcat for a chain-based attack?
writes chained word combinations to output as a standalone generator, meant to be piped straight into hashcat or a similar cracker rather than run on its own
Which combinations of short words add up to the guess length I'm targeting?
for a given output length, works out every way to split it across one or more words from the wordlist and emits each concatenation, from a single whole word down to four one-letter words strung together
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for princeprocessor, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail princeprocessor puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
3 entries
No entries match these filters.
- February 20151
- January 20152
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in hashcat/princeprocessor, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 0 ±0 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 0 +0 joined · −0 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 0 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close < 1 day first maintainer reply 18 hours
- Open backlog 9 of 26 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 9
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 504
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.