pwncat
v0.1.0 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on pwncat's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Netcat-based cyber tool supporting bind/reverse shells, port scanning, port forwarding, firewall/IDSIDSAn intrusion detection system, monitoring traffic or host activity for suspicious behavior and producing alerts. Detection alone does not necessarily block the activity. evasion, and self-injecting shell deployment.
echo 'data' | pwncat --send-on-eof <target> pwncat -L localhost 1337 --rebind --rebind-wait 5 pwncat -L localhost --zero 10.0.0.1/24 pwncat --self-inject --port 443+10 pwncat --self-inject --port 443,8080,9090 pwncat -4 <host> <port> pwncat --listen -L :8080 <host> <port> pwncat -6 <target> pwncat --rebind <target> pwncat -p <port> --ping-word myPing pwncat -p <port> -C CRLF pwncat -e 'ls -la' <target>
Summary
pwncat is an open-source command-line tool, free to use, built as an extended netcat replacement with firewall and IDS/IPSIDS/IPSIntrusion Detection System / Intrusion Prevention System — network or host monitors that inspect traffic for known attack patterns, alerting on matches (IDS) or actively blocking them (IPS). evasion, bind and reverse shells, port forwarding, and port scanning, and it can be scripted in Python. It runs from the terminal on Linux, handling tasks like reconnecting reverse shells, self-injecting a shell over an existing connection, TCPTCPA network protocol that delivers a reliable, ordered stream of bytes between two endpoints. It detects lost data and retransmits it. port scans with banner detection, and forwarding local or remote ports to services such as MySQL. This puts it in the hands of red teamers and penetration testers doing post-exploitation work on compromised hosts, and its own documentation frames it as netcat on steroids rather than a plain replacement. It dates to a 2020 first commit with five contributors, but there have been no commits in the past year, so it should be treated as dormant rather than actively maintained.
Netcat-based cyber tool supporting bind/reverse shells, port scanning, port forwarding, firewall/IDS evasion, and self-injecting shell deployment.
How pwncat helps
Which ports and services are actually reachable on a host I've landed on?
runs a TCP scan against the target and grabs banners on open ports, giving service and version detail rather than a bare open/closed list
Can I turn a connection I already have into a full interactive shell?
injects a shell over the existing socket in place, so the foothold upgrades without opening a second connection an IDS might catch
How do I reach an internal database that's only listening on the compromised host?
forwards a local or remote port through the session to the internal service, so a client on my machine talks to it as if it were local
Will my shell traffic get flagged by the network's firewall or IDS?
shapes and evades traffic at the firewall/IDS level as part of the shell session, rather than sending a plain unencoded stream
How do I script a repeatable post-exploitation sequence instead of typing it by hand each time?
exposes its shell and connection handling to Python so the same reconnect, inject, or forward steps can be driven from a script
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for pwncat, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail pwncat puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
8 entries
No entries match these filters.
- June 20201
- May 20206
- April 20201
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in cytopia/pwncat, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 0 ±0 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 0 +0 joined · −0 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 0 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed not measured of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close not measured issues closed, last 12 months
- Open backlog 13 of 48 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 13
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 1,960
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Articles
1 article · updated Nov 4, 2026Where pwncat turns up in what others publish: how-tos, attack reports that name it, and incident write-ups. A row says why it is here and quotes where the article names it; the link goes to the publisher.
Tutorials & guides 1
-
A Detailed Guide on Pwncat
Pwncat penetration testing tool stands out as an open-source Python tool highly regarded for its versatility, providing a contemporary alternative to the traditional netcat utility.
2 more quotes
With an emphasis on user-friendly features and comprehensive functionality, Pwncat penetration testing tool facilitates seamless interactions with network services, aiding in reconnaissance and vulnerability assessment.
To install using apt use the following command: apt install pwncat To install using pip use the following command: pip install pwncat Usage Port scanning and Banner grabbing Pwncat can be used to perform both port…
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.