Runtime Mobile Security
1.5.24 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on Runtime Mobile Security's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Web interface powered by Frida for manipulating Android and iOS apps at runtime, enabling class dumping, method hooking, and script injection.
rms --port 8080 npm install -g rms-runtime-mobile-security rms
Summary
Runtime Mobile Security is an open-source web interface, built on Frida, that lets you manipulate Android and iOS apps at runtime, dumping loaded classes and methods, hooking calls, tracing arguments and return values, and loading custom scripts. It runs as a local Node.js application: you install Frida's CLI tools, get a Frida server running on the target device, then launch RMS from the command line and drive it through the browser. This is a fit for mobile app pentesters and reverse engineers rather than automated pipelines, since it's built around interactive, on-the-fly exploration of a running app. It sits in the same space as other Frida-based instrumentation front-ends, giving that toolkit a GUIGUIA graphical user interface, controls such as windows, buttons and menus. It lets people use software visually rather than entering commands. instead of raw scripting. Started in 2020 and still active, with 15 contributors and a release 51 days ago.
Web interface powered by Frida for manipulating Android and iOS apps at runtime, enabling class dumping, method hooking, and script injection.
How Runtime Mobile Security helps
Can you change how an app behaves without rebuilding or repatching it?
attaches to the running process through Frida and lets you hook calls or load a custom script on the fly, so behavior changes for that session only
Are the same classes and hooks available on both platforms you are testing?
drives both Android and iOS apps through the same web interface and hooking workflow once a Frida server is reachable on the device
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for Runtime Mobile Security, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Runtime Mobile Security puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
16 entries
No entries match these filters.
- November 20251
- December 20231
- August 20231
- November 20221
- August 20211
- December 20201
- September 20201
- August 20201
- July 20201
- June 20204
- May 20201
- April 20202
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in m0bilesecurity/RMS-Runtime-Mobile-Security, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 4 +3 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 1 +1 joined · −0 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 1 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 99 days first maintainer reply 47 days
- Open backlog 2 of 100 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 2
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 3,091
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.