Securiti
IAB EU TCF v2.4: What Organizations Need to Know (2026-10-19) commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Securiti's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Securiti is a platform that discovers and classifies sensitive data across cloud, SaaSSaaSSoftware delivered over the internet and run on the provider's infrastructure, so the buyer pays a subscription instead of installing or operating anything locally., and on-premises environments and assesses data security risk posture.
Summary
Securiti is a commercial data-security platform that provides unified intelligence and controls across hybrid multicloud environments. It is run as a service, and the tool is for compliance owners and data governance teams. Its documentation positions it alongside AI security tools, and it handles automated compliance testing across twenty checks, including banner correctness and dark pattern detection. The platform features a centralized dashboard showing pass/fail status across frameworks like GDPRGDPREU regulation enacted in 2018 that governs how organizations collect, store, and process personal data of EU residents, giving cyber tools legal obligations around data handling and breach notification. and CCPA. It has had seven releases in the last tracked window.
Securiti is a platform that discovers and classifies sensitive data across cloud, SaaS, and on-premises environments and assesses data security risk posture.
How Securiti helps
Which of my domains have consent banners that don't match what a regulator would require in that jurisdiction?
runs 20+ automated checks against each domain — banner correctness, pre-consent tracking, TC string validity, GPC signal handling, dark patterns, accessibility, privacy policy completeness — and returns pass/fail/NA per check, mapped to the specific legal requirement it tests
Has anything on my sites drifted out of compliance since the last audit?
rescans domains on a schedule and flags new pixels, misfiring tags, or pre-consent script loads against the specific test and timestamp they broke, rather than waiting for the next manual review
Where do I stand across GDPR, CCPA, and the other frameworks I'm accountable for, right now?
a centralized dashboard aggregates pass/fail status by domain, test, and framework into a compliance score with trend graphs and a prioritized findings list
What does this jurisdiction actually require before I configure a banner for it?
draws on a regulatory database covering 80+ jurisdictions' consent templates, cookie guidelines, and case law to determine the jurisdiction-correct configuration before it's built
Can I show a regulator exactly what was wrong and what we did about it?
keeps a before-and-after log of every remediation, automated or manual, timestamped as audit-ready evidence
Who fixed a given finding, and was it resolved, accepted, or excluded?
each finding in the dashboard carries a risk assignment and a status of acceptance, exclusion, or resolution, so the disposition of every issue is traceable
Languages
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Securiti, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Securiti puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Commercials
pricing & packaging history · Securiti vendor page3 readings of Securiti's pricing page since Jul 2024, with 1 relaunch of its plan lineup — each one dated, compared with the reading before it, and explained for someone buying the tool.
Pricing and packaging history is included with Researcher and Business. See how every vendor we track sells, and how that has changed over time, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Plans by offering
Each offering on the pricing page links to its own page of plans, read at its latest capture.
Plan relaunches
Plans, prices and descriptions are quoted from the vendor's own pricing page as we read it on each date. A plan missing from a later reading is shown as no longer listed on the page — a statement about the page, not the product. Readings that failed to show any plans are left out rather than read as a change.
Website history
securiti.ai, every changeSecuriti's home page and 40 more pages as they looked each month from August 2021 to October 2026: 51 renders, 6 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Coverage
Missing something? Tell us
What Securiti connects to, runs on and detects, read from its release notes and docs. So far: 1 updated compliance framework.
1 change, tracked since Oct 19, 2026.
-
Oct 192026
updated IAB EU TCF v2.4 / TCF Policies v5.0.b compliance guidance
With Global Vendor List (GVL), Special Feature 2, Disclosed Vendors segment, TC String
Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) Europe has updated its Transparency and Consent Framework (TCF) through its Technical Specifications v2.4 and TCF Policies v5.0.b. The changes focus on improving transparency around multi-device consent, making TCF Features easier to understand, clarifying Special Feature 2, and ensuring that vendors relying only on TCF Special Purposes are handled through the Disclosed Vendors segment of TC String.
Nothing first seen in this window. That doesn't mean Securiti shipped nothing, only that we found no record of it.
How we count
Read from 1 of 2 release notes and docs updates we hold for Securiti. "First seen" is the earliest note that names something; "last" is the latest. Our history may start partway through Securiti's life, so an old integration can show a recent first-seen date.
Each change counts once: "added 40 checks" is one line, so the numbers measure how often coverage moves, not how big the catalogue is or how well it detects.
Releases
2 entries
No entries match these filters.
- October 20261
- September 20261
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.
Choose a badge style and copy the code →