slowhttptest
v1.10.0 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on slowhttptest's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
SlowHTTPTest is a highly configurable tool that simulates Application Layer Denial of Service attacks by prolonging HTTP connections in different ways.
Summary
slowhttptest is an open-source command-line tool that simulates application-layer denial-of-service attacks by prolonging HTTP connections, letting you see how a web server behaves under slow, low-bandwidth request patterns like slow headers or slow body transmission. It runs as a single binary on Linux, OS X and Cygwin, or via a published Docker image, which suits anyone testing their own infrastructure without building from source. The intended user is a web-app security tester or administrator checking DoS resilience and concurrent-connection limits before an attacker does, rather than a SOCSOCA security operations center, the team or function that monitors threats, investigates alerts and coordinates incident response. Its work can be internal, outsourced or shared. analyst monitoring live traffic. It sits in the application-layer DoS testing category alongside general load and stress tools, but is purpose-built for slow-connection attack patterns like Slowloris rather than raw throughput.
SlowHTTPTest is a highly configurable tool that simulates Application Layer Denial of Service attacks by prolonging HTTP connections in different ways.
How slowhttptest helps
How many concurrent slow connections can my web server absorb before it stops responding?
opens a configurable number of connections that trickle data slowly and reports, in periodic status snapshots, how many stay connected, how many close, and whether the service still answers at each interval
At what point does my server start dropping slow connections instead of holding them open?
tracks connected versus closed counts at each snapshot, and an early exit with no open connections left marks the moment the target gave up before the configured test duration finished
Is my server still serving real requests while it's under a pile of slow connections?
checks service availability at every snapshot interval, so a run showing available at every check confirms the target kept responding despite the held-open load
Can my server hold up against connections that trickle both requests and bodies slowly?
prolongs HTTP connections in different ways, letting the same server be tested against slow headers and slow message bodies rather than a single attack shape
Will my server tolerate slow clients that also require mutual TLS?
supports client certificates during the test, so servers that mandate mutual TLS authentication can be put under slow-connection load without the handshake itself blocking the test
Does my server treat one slow endpoint differently if requests carry specific headers?
lets custom headers be injected into the slow request payloads, so behavior under load can be checked for endpoints that only engage certain logic when a given header is present
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for slowhttptest, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail slowhttptest puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
1 entry
No entries match these filters.
- August 20261
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in shekyan/slowhttptest, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 1 −1 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 1 +1 joined · −0 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 1 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 4.5 years first maintainer reply 25 hours
- Open backlog 3 of 66 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 3
- Contributors / month 1
- Commits / month 46
- Stars 1,651
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.