sublist3r
V1.0 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on sublist3r's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Fast subdomains enumeration tool for penetration testers - aboul3la/Sublist3r
sublist3r -d example.com -p 80,443
Summary
Sublist3r is an open-source, free, command-line tool written in Python that enumerates the subdomains of a target domain using OSINTOSINTOpen-source intelligence, collecting and analyzing information from publicly available sources. Investigators use it to learn about people, infrastructure or threats. sources such as Google, Bing, Yahoo, Baidu, Ask, Netcraft, VirusTotal, ThreatCrowd and DNSdumpster, with an optional bruteforce module (via subbrute) to turn up names passive sources miss. It's aimed at penetration testers and bug bounty hunters doing early-stage recon, run by cloning the repo and invoking it from the command line with flags for domain, port scanning, thread count, engine selection and output format. It sits in the passive-recon and subdomain-enumeration space, covering ground now split across several dedicated OSINT and DNS recon tools. The project dates to 2015 and has drawn 30 contributors, but there have been no commits in the past year, so treat it as stable rather than actively maintained.
Fast subdomains enumeration tool for penetration testers - aboul3la/Sublist3r
How sublist3r helps
Which subdomains does a target domain have that are visible to public search engines and OSINT sources?
queries Google, Yahoo, Bing, Baidu, Ask, Netcraft, VirusTotal, ThreatCrowd and DNSdumpster for the domain and merges their results into a single deduplicated subdomain list
Which subdomains exist but never show up in search-engine indexes?
runs the bundled bruteforce module against a wordlist, resolving each guess via DNS to surface names passive sources miss
Which of these discovered subdomains have something reachable listening on them?
takes the compiled subdomain list and scans each host for open ports, flagging which ones have live services
Which OSINT sources actually contributed to this domain's subdomain list, and can I narrow the search?
lets you select which search engines and sources run, so you can see results source-by-source rather than only as a merged list
How do I get this subdomain list into another recon tool or report?
writes the enumerated subdomains to an output file for feeding into subsequent scanning or reporting steps
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for sublist3r, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail sublist3r puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
1 entry
No entries match these filters.
- July 20161
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in aboul3la/Sublist3r, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 0 ±0 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 0 +0 joined · −0 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 0 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close not measured issues closed, last 12 months
- Open backlog 160 of 231 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 160
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 11,042
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.