whatweb
v0.6.4 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on whatweb's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
WhatWeb identifies websites, recognising web technologies including CMSCMSA web content management system for creating and managing digital content without writing code directly; cyber tools use CMS platforms to host documentation, portals, or reporting dashboards quickly., blogging platforms, JavaScript libraries, web servers, and embedded devices using over 1800 plugins.
WHATWEB_PROFILE=1 whatweb --threads 20 -v http://example.com
whatweb --cookie-jar cookies.txt https://target.example.com
whatweb --no-cookies -i targets.txt --log-brief=results.txt
{ :name=>"File extension", :regexp=>/^(php|phtml|php3|php4|php5|phps)$/, :search=>"uri.extension" }
whatweb --cookie-jar=/path/to/cookies.txt <target>
ruby plugin-development/migrate-plugins-to-v0.5.rb
whatweb --output-elasticsearch http://localhost:9200/target
whatweb --log-mongo-database scans --log-mongo-host localhost --log-mongo-collection targets http://example.com
whatweb -u 'admin:password' --wait 2 http://example.com/admin
whatweb -q --log-json http://example.com
whatweb --url-pattern 'example.com/%s%.html' -i target_list.txt
whatweb --custom-plugin "{:text=>'powered by abc'}" -i ./targets
whatweb -I example.com
whatweb --no-redirect http://example.com
mkdir -p ~/my-plugins && echo '# My Plugin' > ~/my-plugins/my_custom.plg
whatweb --log-xml report.xml http://example.com
whatweb --plugin=header-hash,footer-hash,div-span-structure https://example.com
whatweb --proxy=http://proxy:8080 http://example.com
Summary
whatweb is an open-source, GPLv2-licensed command-line scanner that identifies the technologies behind a website — CMS, blogging platforms, analytics packages, JavaScript libraries, web servers, and embedded devices — using over 1800 plugins, and can also surface version numbers, email addresses, account IDs, and SQL errors along the way. It's built for people doing recon work, whether that's a pentester profiling a target or someone auditing their own site's exposed stack, and it sits in the web-fingerprinting corner of reconnaissance tooling rather than broader vulnerability scanning. Scans run over both HTTP and HTTPSHTTPSHTTP carried over an encrypted TLS connection. It protects traffic in transit and lets a browser verify the server's certificate. automatically, support legacy SSLSSLA cryptographic protocol for encrypting network connections, now deprecated in favor of TLS but whose name persists colloquially. Cyber tools reference it when handling HTTPS or other encrypted-channel inspection and termination./TLS for older targets, and can route through Tor for .onion domains. First committed in 2010 and still active, with 73 contributors and a release as recently as 141 days ago.
WhatWeb identifies websites, recognising web technologies including CMS, blogging platforms, JavaScript libraries, web servers, and embedded devices using over 1800 plugins.
How whatweb helps
What technologies is a website actually built on?
scans the target and reports back the CMS, web server, JavaScript libraries, and analytics packages it recognizes, matched against over 1800 plugins
Which exact software versions is a site running, and could that be exposed?
runs its plugins in a more thorough mode that digs for precise version strings instead of just naming the technology
Has a site leaked anything it shouldn't have, like email addresses or account IDs?
picks through page content and headers for those patterns and surfaces them alongside the fingerprint results
Are there embedded devices or SQL errors hiding in a set of sites I'm responsible for?
sweeps a list of hosts and flags SQL error text and known embedded-device signatures wherever its plugins match
Can I fingerprint a hidden service without leaking DNS lookups?
routes the scan through a proxy and skips DNS resolution for onion domains so the lookup itself doesn't reveal the target
Will an older or legacy server even respond to a modern scan?
negotiates legacy SSL/TLS versions alongside current ones so older targets that only speak outdated protocols still return a fingerprint
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for whatweb, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail whatweb puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
19 entries
No entries match these filters.
- April 20261
- October 20251
- August 20252
- January 20211
- December 20201
- October 20201
- June 20201
- February 20201
- October 20191
- November 20171
- April 20111
- March 20111
- August 20101
- June 20101
- May 20101
- April 20102
- March 20101
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in urbanadventurer/WhatWeb, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 4 +2 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 2 +1 joined · −0 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 1 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 6.1 years first maintainer reply 113 days
- Open backlog 41 of 222 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 41
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 6,846
- features 25%
- other 75%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Articles
1 article · updated Nov 4, 2026Where whatweb turns up in what others publish: how-tos, attack reports that name it, and incident write-ups. A row says why it is here and quotes where the article names it; the link goes to the publisher.
Breach post-mortems & incident response 1
-
Gaming the system: how a Chinese-speaking actor turned Brazilian government sites into an SEO weapon
whatweb – a Wappalyzer-style fingerprinter that issues HTTP requests to each target and applies rules to identify web servers, frameworks, CMS platforms, JavaScript libraries, and more.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.