wpprobe
v0.12.6 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on wpprobe's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
WPProbe scans WordPress sites to detect installed plugins and themes, then maps them to known vulnerabilities from Wordfence and WPScan databases.
wpprobe scan -u https://example.com --mode bruteforce wpprobe scan -f targets.txt -t 20 --mode hybrid -o results.json WPSCAN_API_TOKEN=your_token_here wpprobe update-db wpprobe uninstall
Summary
wpprobe is an open-source command-line scanner that enumerates WordPress plugins and themes on a target site and maps them to known vulnerabilities, and it costs nothing to use. It detects plugins mainly through REST APIREST APIA web API design style where clients interact with resources over HTTP using standard methods like GET, POST, and DELETE, giving cyber tools a predictable, language-agnostic way to integrate with external services. enumeration and themes through HTML discovery, covering over 5000 plugins without brute-forcing, with a bruteforce or hybrid mode available for broader coverage against directories directly; findings are cross-referenced against a vulnerability database pulled from WPScan or Wordfence data. It is aimed at penetration testers and bug bounty hunters doing WordPress recon rather than at developers securing their own sites, and it sits in the CMSCMSA web content management system for creating and managing digital content without writing code directly; cyber tools use CMS platforms to host documentation, portals, or reporting dashboards quickly.-scanning corner of web-app security alongside tools like WPScan, though WPProbe leans on unauthenticated REST API fingerprinting for stealth. First committed in 2025, it has 11 contributors, 84 commits in the past year, and a release 43 days ago, so it is actively maintained.
WPProbe scans WordPress sites to detect installed plugins and themes, then maps them to known vulnerabilities from Wordfence and WPScan databases.
How wpprobe helps
Which plugins and themes is this WordPress site actually running?
fingerprints installed plugins through REST API endpoint matching and themes through HTML discovery, covering over 5000 plugins without touching the filesystem directly
Does this target have any known vulnerable plugins or themes on it?
cross-references every detected slug and version against a vulnerability database sourced from WPScan and Wordfence and lists the matching CVEs with exploitability context
Am I missing plugins that stealthy detection can't see?
switches to a bruteforce or hybrid mode that checks directories directly, trading stealth for coverage of thousands more plugins than REST enumeration alone reaches
Can I check a whole list of WordPress sites in one pass?
accepts multiple targets and threads the scan across them, producing the same plugin/theme/vulnerability findings per host
Which of my targets are exposed to a specific CVE I care about?
searches the vulnerability database by CVE identifier or by plugin name and returns the matching entries without requiring a live scan first
Is my vulnerability data stale before I trust a scan's results?
flags when the local vulnerability database is out of date and prompts an update before results are reported
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for wpprobe, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail wpprobe puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
12 entries
No entries match these filters.
- August 20261
- June 20261
- March 20263
- February 20261
- December 20252
- June 20251
- May 20251
- February 20252
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in Chocapikk/wpprobe, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 3 −6 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 1 +0 joined · −0 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 1 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 2 days first maintainer reply 3 hours
- Open backlog 0 of 16 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 0
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 946
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.