xsstrike
3.1.2 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on xsstrike's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
XSS detection suite that crawls targets, analyzes response context, and generates context-aware payloads to find reflected, DOMDOMThe browser's in-memory tree representation of a web page's structure, standardized by the W3C, giving cyber tools a programmable interface to read or manipulate page content at runtime., and blind XSS vulnerabilities.
xsstrike -u https://example.com/page --headers 'Authorization: Bearer <token>; X-Custom-Header: value' xsstrike -u http://example.com/page --skip bad_contexts.txt xsstrike -u https://internal-app.local --insecure
Summary
xsstrike is an open-source command-line tool for finding cross-site scriptingcross-site scriptingCross-site scripting, an attack that runs malicious script in another user's browser through a trusted site. It can steal data or perform actions using the user's session. vulnerabilities, free to use, built around hand-written HTML and JavaScript parsers that analyse a page's response and generate context-specific payloads rather than firing a fixed wordlist and checking what sticks. It also crawls a target, discovers parameters, fuzzes them, detects and evades WAFs, and checks for outdated JS libraries and DOM-based XSS, which suits penetration testers and bug bounty hunters who currently stitch these steps together from separate recon and fuzzing tools. First committed in 2017 and grown by 30 contributors across 29 tracked releases, it has had no commits in the past year and its last release was over 500 days ago, so treat it as stable but no longer actively maintained.
XSS detection suite that crawls targets, analyzes response context, and generates context-aware payloads to find reflected, DOM, and blind XSS vulnerabilities.
How xsstrike helps
Which parameters on this page can actually be used to inject script, and not just reflect it?
crawls the target, discovers parameters, and parses the response with its HTML and JavaScript parsers to work out the surrounding context before crafting a payload guaranteed to fire in that context, rather than firing a fixed wordlist and checking what sticks
Does this page have a DOM-based XSS issue that never shows up in the server response?
scans the DOM directly for sources and sinks that a purely server-side response check would miss
Is a firewall in front of this target going to block or reshape my requests before they reach the code being tested?
detects which WAF is in front of the target and adjusts payloads to evade it
Are any of the JavaScript libraries this page loads carrying a known vulnerability?
checks the libraries the page pulls in against known outdated versions and reports which ones are stale
Can I get a payload past this input without tripping the obvious filters, using something other than the built-in generator?
accepts a file of bruteforce payloads and tests each one against the target in place of, or alongside, its own generated set
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for xsstrike, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail xsstrike puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
2 entries
No entries match these filters.
- December 20181
- November 20181
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in s0md3v/XSStrike, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 0 −2 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 0 +0 joined · −1 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 0 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close not measured issues closed, last 12 months
- Open backlog 70 of 295 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 70
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 15,188
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.