Acalvio
commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Acalvio's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Acalvio is a deception technology platform that deploys decoys and honeypots to detect advanced threats and insider attacks.
Summary
Acalvio is a commercial deception technology that detects threats early using cyber deception technology. It is run as a platform service and is aimed at practitioners involved in active defense or identity protection. Its documentation positions it alongside other deception platforms in the network-defense space. The product was first launched in 2015.
Acalvio is a deception technology platform that deploys decoys and honeypots to detect advanced threats and insider attacks.
How Acalvio helps
Is an attacker moving through this network before they reach anything real?
plants decoy hosts, credentials and services among genuine assets, so any interaction with them is treated as a high-confidence signal of intrusion rather than something to be filtered from noise
Which of the credentials sitting on these endpoints could hand an attacker a path to a real account?
seeds lure credentials and identity artifacts alongside genuine ones, so their use flags exactly which identity path an attacker followed
Has anyone touched a system that has no legitimate business reason to be touched?
monitors decoy assets that no normal user or process ever has cause to reach, so any access to them is inherently suspicious rather than requiring a baseline of normal behavior
Where in the environment would an attacker go looking after an initial foothold, and are we watching there?
places deception assets along the paths an intruder is likely to explore next, turning post-compromise reconnaissance into an early detection point instead of a blind spot
Languages
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Acalvio, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Acalvio puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
4 entries
No entries match these filters.
- September 20264
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.