Bedrock Security
commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Bedrock Security's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Summary
Bedrock Security is a commercial data-security platform that unifies data, identity, and AI context to show teams real risk without moving data. It is available as a SaaSSaaSSoftware delivered over the internet and run on the provider's infrastructure, so the buyer pays a subscription instead of installing or operating anything locally. service and is built for teams interested in data-discovery, AI-data-governance, and DSPMDSPMData security posture management, locating sensitive data and checking how it is protected and who can reach it. It helps teams prioritize risks around their data stores.. The platform sits within the data-security category. It was launched in 2022.
How Bedrock Security helps
Which of my data stores actually hold sensitive information nobody is watching?
scans data across environments in place, without moving or copying it, and classifies what it finds so sensitive stores are surfaced by content rather than by name or location
Which identities can reach data they have no business touching?
correlates identity and access records against the data each account can reach, naming the accounts whose permissions exceed what their role or usage pattern justifies
Where is my sensitive data exposed to AI models or agents I never approved for it?
maps the flow between data stores and the AI tools and pipelines consuming them, flagging sensitive data reachable by models or agents outside the intended boundary
Which of the risks flagged today are the ones that actually matter?
combines data sensitivity, identity exposure, and AI context into a single risk view, ranking findings so the ones combining real access with real sensitivity surface above noise
Has a change in access or AI usage quietly increased risk to a data store I already reviewed?
reassesses stores continuously against current identity and AI context, rather than a point-in-time snapshot, so a shift in exposure since the last review shows up on its own
Languages
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Bedrock Security, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Bedrock Security puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
10 entries
No entries match these filters.
- September 202610
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.