Eclypsium
Safe AI Agents Start With Trusted AI Infrastructure (2026-09-28) commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Eclypsium's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Eclypsium’s infrastructure assurance platform protects mission critical hardware and detects compromised devices in enterprises and government agencies.
Summary
Eclypsium is a commercial endpoint-security platform that enhances supply chain security by incorporating zero-trust across device hardware, firmware, and software. It is run as a self-hosted service, and it is designed for practitioners interested in firmware-security and hardware-integrity. Its documentation positions it alongside other endpoint-security solutions in the market. It was launched in 2017 and has seen eleven releases in the tracked window, with its last release occurring this week.
Eclypsium’s infrastructure assurance platform protects mission critical hardware and detects compromised devices in enterprises and government agencies.
How Eclypsium helps
Which devices in this environment have firmware that has been tampered with or downgraded?
inspects firmware on managed hardware against known-good baselines and flags devices whose firmware differs, including rollbacks to older, more vulnerable versions
Which hardware components are running firmware or microcode with a known vulnerability?
checks the firmware and component inventory across endpoints against a database of disclosed flaws and lists the affected devices and versions
Is any device on the network running unauthorized or unexpected firmware?
compares the observed firmware state of each device to its expected baseline and surfaces any that were not provisioned that way
Which suppliers or hardware batches introduced a compromised component into the fleet?
traces firmware and hardware identifiers back through the supply chain so a bad batch or vendor can be tied to the specific devices affected
Has a device's boot process been altered outside of a normal patch cycle?
monitors low-level boot and firmware state over time and reports changes that fall outside expected update activity
Which endpoints need attention first when a firmware vulnerability is disclosed?
correlates the vulnerability against the actual firmware inventory in the environment so remediation can be prioritized by exposure rather than guesswork
Languages
Features
Built from Eclypsium's releases, docs, README and our own runs. “Seen” marks the month we first spotted a release the vendor didn't date.
No capabilities match.
All capabilities 4 capabilities
Continuous firmware integrity and drift monitoring shipped Continuously monitors infrastructure components throughout their lifecycle for integrity drift, unauthorized firmware modifications, and persistent compromise — beyond point-in-time deployment checks.
release
-
Provides component-level evidence of device and firmware posture — including known-good baseline comparisons and supply-chain risk — to inform decisions about when agent workloads are permitted to run.
Safe AI Agents Start With Trusted AI Infrastructure (2026-09-28) · Sep 2026
· source
· release history
- Continuously monitors AI infrastructure components for integrity drift, unauthorized firmware modifications, and persistent compromise throughout the device lifecycle — not just at deployment time. Safe AI Agents Start With Trusted AI Infrastructure (2026-09-28) · Sep 2026 · source · release history
AI infrastructure hardware and firmware inventory shipped Inventories hardware, firmware, and OS code across AI-specific components including GPUs, DPUs, TPUs, BMCs, NICs, HBM, SSDs, TPMs, and accelerators.
release
-
Adds AI Infrastructure Assurance coverage for AI-specific components — GPUs, DPUs (including NVIDIA BlueField-4), TPUs, BMCs, NICs, HBM, SSDs, TPMs, and accelerators — inventorying hardware, firmware, and OS code across all of them.︀︄︇︀︅︉︀︅︀︀︃︀︀︅︅︀︅︊︀︄︆︀︃︄
Safe AI Agents Start With Trusted AI Infrastructure (2026-09-28) · Sep 2026
· source
· release history
Device and firmware posture assessment shipped suggested Provides component-level evidence of device and firmware posture — including known-good baseline comparisons and supply-chain risk — to support decisions about workload admission.
Suggested capability: Security baseline assessment. This is our guess, not confirmed.
release
-
Provides component-level evidence of device and firmware posture — including known-good baseline comparisons and supply-chain risk — to inform decisions about when agent workloads are permitted to run.
Safe AI Agents Start With Trusted AI Infrastructure (2026-09-28) · Sep 2026
· source
· release history
NVIDIA Open Agent Safety Platform integration shipped Integrates with NVIDIA Open Agent Safety Platform to extend firmware integrity verification and vulnerability identification to the infrastructure underpinning NVIDIA OpenShell and NVIDIA Sentry enforcement boundaries.
release
-
Integrates with NVIDIA Open Agent Safety Platform to extend Eclypsium's firmware integrity verification and vulnerability identification to the infrastructure underpinning NVIDIA OpenShell and NVIDIA Sentry enforcement boundaries.
Safe AI Agents Start With Trusted AI Infrastructure (2026-09-28) · Sep 2026
· source
· release history
Lines in monospace are the tool's own words: help text
parsed from its source, or an endpoint from its API document. Under
release, a line is our summary of a dated release. Under
docs, it is quoted from the tool's own documentation or
website. Each links back to the source it came from.
Screenshots
From the release notes, newest first. Click one to see it full size.Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Eclypsium, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Eclypsium puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Website history
eclypsium.com, every changeEclypsium's home page and 41 more pages as they looked each month from September 2021 to October 2026: 53 renders, 7 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
1 entry
No entries match these filters.
- September 20261
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.
Choose a badge style and copy the code →