Enveil
commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Enveil's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Summary
Enveil is a commercial data-security platform that protects data in use to enable secure data usage, collaboration, and monetization. It is offered as a service and is designed for organizations looking to unlock value from sensitive data while maintaining privacy. Its capabilities relate to homomorphic encryption, secure search, and other privacy-enhancing technologies, placing it within the data-security cyber tool category. The platform was first launched in 2016.
How Enveil helps
Can sensitive data be searched or analyzed without ever decrypting it for the party running the computation?
encrypts the query and the data using homomorphic encryption so the processing party operates only on ciphertext and never sees the plaintext values or the result
Can two organizations that don't trust each other combine or compare their data without either side exposing its raw records?
runs the matching or analysis inside encrypted space so each party's contribution stays encrypted to the other, with only the agreed output ever decrypted
Which of our data-sharing or monetization deals are we turning down because the other side would have to see our raw data?
lets the data owner keep records encrypted through the entire search or computation, so a deal that stalled on exposure risk can proceed against the encrypted copy instead
Is our data still exposed while it's actively being used, not just at rest or in transit?
classifies that in-use gap as its target and closes it with homomorphic encryption and secure search rather than access controls or storage encryption, which don't cover data while it's being computed on
Languages
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Enveil, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Enveil puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
1 entry
No entries match these filters.
- September 20261
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.
Choose a badge style and copy the code →