getsploit
v3.0.0 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on getsploit's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Getsploit searches and downloads public exploits from the Vulners database online, or fully offline from a local SQLite FTS5FTS5A full-text search extension built into SQLite that lets tools index and query large bodies of text efficiently, with ranking and phrase-match support, without an external search engine. index.
getsploit --update getsploit --local 'title:eternalblue AND NOT description:metasploit' getsploit --format jsonl wordpress | jq -r .id getsploit --local --mirror eternalblue export VULNERS_API_KEY="your-key" getsploit --update getsploit --local 'title:eternalblue AND NOT description:metasploit' getsploit --format jsonl wordpress 4.7 | jq -r .id getsploit --local --mirror eternalblue getsploit --update && getsploit --local 'title:eternalblue AND NOT description:metasploit' getsploit --format jsonl wordpress | jq -r .id getsploit --local --mirror eternalblue getsploit --status getsploit --update getsploit --local 'title:eternalblue AND NOT description:metasploit' getsploit --format jsonl wordpress | jq -r .id getsploit --local --mirror CVE-2024-3094 getsploit --update getsploit --local 'title:eternalblue AND NOT description:metasploit' getsploit --local --format jsonl wordpress 4.7 | jq -r .id getsploit --local --mirror eternalblue getsploit --set-key YOUR-KEY getsploit title:wordpress AND title:"4.7.0"
Summary
getsploit is an open-source command-line tool that searches and downloads public exploits from the Vulners database, either online or from a fully offline local index. It is free to use, distributed under the MIT licence, and run as a CLI installed from PyPI. It suits penetration testers and red teamers who need to check a target's software version against known exploits without leaving the terminal, pulling from Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Packet Storm, Zero Day Initiative and GitHub proof-of-concept repositories in one query. Results can be filtered to specific fields like title for version-scoped searches, and output renders as tables, JSON, or JSONLJSONLA text format where each line is a self-contained, valid JSON object, making it easy to stream, append, and process large datasets line by line without parsing a full JSON array into memory.. First committed in 2017 and still maintained by a small team, with a release as recent as this week.
Getsploit searches and downloads public exploits from the Vulners database online, or fully offline from a local SQLite FTS5 index.
How getsploit helps
Does the software running on this target already have a public exploit against it?
matches the version string against Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Packet Storm, Zero Day Initiative and GitHub proof-of-concept entries indexed by Vulners and lists every hit in one query
Can I still search for exploits with no network reach from this engagement box?
runs the same query against a local SQLite index built from a prior sync, so lookups work fully offline
Is there a working proof-of-concept I can hand to another tool in the chain?
renders results as table, JSON or JSONL, so a script downstream can consume the exploit list without screen-scraping
Has a CVE I'm tracking picked up a new exploit since I last checked?
a keyword or CVE-scoped search against the online index returns entries by publish date, surfacing anything added since the last look
Am I missing exploits because my local mirror is stale?
reports the local database's size and path so a reader can tell whether it reflects a recent sync or an old one
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for getsploit, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail getsploit puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
8 entries
No entries match these filters.
- September 20262
- August 20265
- September 20251
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in vulnersCom/getsploit, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 1 ±0 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 1 +1 joined · −1 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 1 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 5 years first maintainer reply 50 days
- Open backlog 0 of 23 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 0
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 1,819
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.