ImmuniWeb
commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on ImmuniWeb's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Summary
ImmuniWeb is a commercial AI platform for web-app-security that performs application security testing, attack surfaceattack surfaceThe exposed systems, interfaces and access points an attacker could try to use. It includes internet-facing services as well as identities, software and other reachable resources. management, and dark web monitoring. It is available as a SaaSSaaSSoftware delivered over the internet and run on the provider's infrastructure, so the buyer pays a subscription instead of installing or operating anything locally. service and is designed for practitioners needing attack-surface-management capabilities. Its documentation positions it alongside tools for compliance and DASTDASTDynamic application security testing, probing a running application from the outside for vulnerabilities. It checks behavior exposed through the application's interfaces.. The platform has released 12 versions within the tracked window.
How ImmuniWeb helps
Which parts of my external attack surface am I not aware of?
continuously discovers internet-facing assets tied to the organization and lists domains, subdomains, and hosts the practitioner did not already have inventoried
Which of my web applications have exploitable vulnerabilities?
runs application security testing against the app and reports findings mapped to the vulnerable endpoint, ready for a compliance or DAST review
Is any of our data already circulating on the dark web?
monitors dark web sources for mentions of company assets, credentials, or data and reports matches back to the practitioner
Does our security posture meet the compliance standards we're audited against?
checks findings from the testing and asset-discovery work against named compliance frameworks and reports where the posture falls short
Which exposed assets are actually reachable and worth prioritizing first?
combines the attack-surface inventory with the vulnerability findings so a practitioner can see which discovered hosts carry confirmed weaknesses rather than triaging the whole list blind
Languages
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for ImmuniWeb, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail ImmuniWeb puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Website history
immuniweb.com, every changeImmuniWeb's 44 pages as they looked each month from October 2026 to October 2026: 44 renders, 0 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
1 entry
No entries match these filters.
- October 20261
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.