LogicGate
Introducing LogicGate’s Cyber Risk Management Agents (2026-10-15) commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on LogicGate's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Summary
LogicGate is a commercial governance, risk, and compliance platform that automates risk and compliance workflows, run as a SaaSSaaSSoftware delivered over the internet and run on the provider's infrastructure, so the buyer pays a subscription instead of installing or operating anything locally. product under its Risk Cloud offering. It is built for compliance owners and risk management teams who need to track controls, assessments, and vendor risk across an organization rather than in spreadsheets. Within Risk Cloud, practitioners can search records across applications, switch between risk domains without losing workflow state, and let configurable automations route tasks and alerts, while an agentic engine called Config Newton builds out GRCGRCGovernance, Risk, and Compliance — a framework for aligning IT controls with business policy, regulatory requirements, and risk management so organizations can audit and report on their posture systematically. programs and an AI Governance module maps AI-related risk against frameworks like the NIST AI RMFNIST AI RMFA voluntary framework published by NIST that gives organizations a structured process for identifying, assessing, and managing risks introduced by AI systems, giving cyber tools a common vocabulary and governance scaffold. and EU AI ActEU AI ActEU regulation that classifies AI systems by risk level and imposes compliance obligations—documentation, transparency, human oversight—on developers and deployers, shaping how AI-based cyber tools are built and sold in Europe., with agent actions logged for audit. It sits in the integrated-risk-management category alongside other GRC platforms, and with 18 releases tracked and the most recent just 16 days ago, it is under active development.
How LogicGate helps
Which vendors or third parties are carrying risk that nobody has assessed yet?
routes vendors to assessment automatically based on risk signals, completes formal assessments, and flags findings for a person to remediate, rather than waiting for a scheduled review
Which AI use cases in the organization are actually risky, and against which framework?
maps the AI ecosystem in use, scores each use case against NIST AI RMF categories automatically, and surfaces business-impact indicators tied to the EU AI Act for review
Is this piece of control evidence actually good enough to pass, right now?
tests evidence at the moment it is submitted and returns a pass or fail with a stated rationale, flagging gaps immediately instead of at the next audit cycle
Where did this record come from, and what else in the organization touches it?
finds and links a given record across every Risk Cloud application it has permission to see, including bulk suggestions across hundreds of records at once
Can I try a new workflow without breaking what my compliance team is running today?
syncs the live production instance to a separate development copy so changes can be built and tested there before being promoted
What did an automated agent actually do to my workflow, and can I check its reasoning later?
logs every agent action taken during triage, routing, or assessment so a practitioner can audit the decision after the fact
Languages
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for LogicGate, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail LogicGate puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Coverage
Missing something? Tell us
What LogicGate connects to, runs on and detects, read from its release notes and docs. So far: 1 new compliance framework.
1 change, tracked since Oct 15, 2026.
-
Oct 152026
new NIST Cybersecurity Framework and ISO/IEC 27001 control mapping in Cyber Risk Assessment Agent
LogicGate's control repository maps to standards such as the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and ISO/IEC 27001.
Nothing first seen in this window. That doesn't mean LogicGate shipped nothing, only that we found no record of it.
How we count
Read from 1 of 5 release notes and docs updates we hold for LogicGate. "First seen" is the earliest note that names something; "last" is the latest. Our history may start partway through LogicGate's life, so an old integration can show a recent first-seen date.
Each change counts once: "added 40 checks" is one line, so the numbers measure how often coverage moves, not how big the catalogue is or how well it detects.
Releases
5 entries
No entries match these filters.
- October 20262
- September 20261
- June 20262
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.
Choose a badge style and copy the code →