Metasploit Framework
open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on Metasploit Framework's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Open-source penetration testing framework for developing, testing, and executing exploits against remote targets.
Summary
Metasploit Framework is an open-source exploitation framework, released under a BSD-style license, that lets users develop, test, and run exploits against remote targets, with over 7,100 modules covering auxiliary scanners, exploits, encoders, and payloads. It runs as a command-line tool, launched from a primary console interface, and can also expose an RPCRPCRemote Procedure Call, a protocol that lets a program execute a function on another machine as if it were local, giving cyber tools a structured way to communicate across processes or hosts without managing raw sockets. server or MCPMCPModel Context Protocol, a standard for connecting AI applications to external tools and data sources. A compatible server exposes capabilities an assistant can use through a common interface. interface for scripted or agent-driven use. It is built for penetration testers and red teamers who need exploit development and post-exploitation tooling, including payload generation and command-and-control functionality, rather than for defenders doing detection work. It ships pre-installed on Kali Linux, which situates it as a standard part of that toolkit rather than a niche add-on. With 1,642 contributors, nearly 3,000 commits in the past year, and a release 22 days ago, it is under active, continuous development.
Open-source penetration testing framework for developing, testing, and executing exploits against remote targets.
How Metasploit Framework helps
Is a specific host actually vulnerable to a flaw I think it has, or just running the affected version?
loads the matching exploit or scanner module and runs it against the target live, returning a confirmed result instead of a version-based guess
Can I get interactive control of a machine I've found a way into?
delivers a generated payload through the chosen exploit and hands back a session (including Meterpreter) for command execution and further post-exploitation on that host
What else can I reach or extract once I've compromised one machine on this network?
runs post-exploitation modules against the open session to pivot, gather credentials, or enumerate the internal network from the compromised host's vantage point
Which of the thousands of known exploits actually apply to the services I've found running here?
searches the module set by service, platform, or CVE and lists the matching auxiliary, exploit, and scanner modules to try against those targets
Will my generated payload get caught by the defenses on this target?
builds the payload with chosen encoders to test whether it executes past the target's antivirus or filtering before delivery
Can my own script or agent drive an engagement instead of me typing into the console?
exposes the same exploit, session, and module functionality over an RPC server or MCP interface so external tooling can run and control an engagement programmatically
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for Metasploit Framework, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Metasploit Framework puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Commercials
pricing & packaging history · Rapid7 vendor page13 readings of Rapid7's pricing page since Oct 2021, with 1 relaunch of its plan lineup and 2 changes to what its plans include — each one dated, compared with the reading before it, and explained for someone buying the tool.
Pricing and packaging history is included with Researcher and Business. See how every vendor we track sells, and how that has changed over time, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Plans by offering
Each offering on the pricing page links to its own page of plans, read at its latest capture.
Plan relaunches
Plans, prices and descriptions are quoted from the vendor's own pricing page as we read it on each date. A plan missing from a later reading is shown as no longer listed on the page — a statement about the page, not the product. Readings that failed to show any plans are left out rather than read as a change.
Website history
metasploit.com, every changeRapid7's home page and 4 more pages as they looked each month from August 2021 to October 2026: 37 renders, 0 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
4 entries
No entries match these filters.
- September 20261
- August 20262
- July 20261
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in rapid7/metasploit-framework, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 164 +55 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 30 +23 joined · −12 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 8 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 38 days first maintainer reply 24 days
- Open backlog 492 of 6,599 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 8 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 492
- Contributors / month 22
- Commits / month 102
- Stars 39,018
- bugs 38%
- features 29%
- questions 5%
- docs 4%
- other 24%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Articles
16 articles · updated Nov 4, 2026Where Metasploit Framework turns up in what others publish: how-tos, attack reports that name it, and incident write-ups. A row says why it is here and quotes where the article names it; the link goes to the publisher.
Used in the wild 16
-
PaperCut Attacker Uses Hundreds of AI Agents to Compromise 440+ Instances
…activity included delivery of Windows registry hive collection tools, Metasploit/Meterpreter-related Java payloads, and commands used to identify hosts, users, processes, and sensitive configuration data," Arctic…
-
Attackers Exploit PaperCut Flaws to Steal Credentials From Schools and Universities
…activity included delivery of Windows registry hive collection tools, Metasploit/Meterpreter-related Java payloads, and commands used to identify hosts, users, processes, and sensitive configuration data," Arctic…
-
UAT-10147: Chinese-speaking adversary integrates agentic AI into post-compromise operations
To weaponize these flaws, the threat actor utilizes the Metasploit Framework to construct targeted exploits and deploy Meterpreter backdoors.
Show all 16
Threat coverage
Content for the last year of exploited CVEs and attack reports.Metasploit Framework has content for 183 of the 982 threats tracked in the last year, 150 of them exact.
See the threats, and how similar tools compare threat by threat, with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Threats with content
Compared with similar tools
Only Metasploit Framework covers
Peers cover, Metasploit Framework shows no content
Not indexed means we do not read this tool's content yet. It is not a gap.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.