OpenVPN
v2.7.6 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on OpenVPN's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
OpenVPN is an open source VPN daemon
echo 'push-update-broad route 10.8.1.0 255.255.255.0' | nc 127.0.0.1 7505 echo 'push-update-cid 42 dhcp-option DNS 1.1.1.1' | nc 127.0.0.1 7505 openvpn --config legacy-client.ovpn --disable-dco set WINS server 192.0.2.1
Summary
OpenVPN is an open-source tunneling daemon that encrypts network traffic between a client and a server to create a secure remote-access VPN, free to download and build from source under the GPL. It runs as a background service: a daemon on the server side and a client install (desktop, mobile, or embedded) on the connecting end, configured through text files and a management interface rather than a GUIGUIA graphical user interface, controls such as windows, buttons and menus. It lets people use software visually rather than entering commands.-first workflow. It fits network and security administrators who need to grant remote users access to an internal network rather than end users wanting a commercial privacy app. It sits in the broader secure-access and VPN category, alongside other encrypted-tunneling protocols rather than any single named competitor, with features like TLS 1.3, kernel-level data channel offload (DCO), and per-platform DNS handling marking it as protocol-level infrastructure rather than a turnkey product.
OpenVPN is an open source VPN daemon
How OpenVPN helps
Can remote users reach a private network resource as if they were physically on it?
establishes an encrypted point-to-point or site-to-site tunnel over SSL/TLS between the client and the server's network, routing traffic through it as a virtual interface
Will a client's DNS queries leak outside the tunnel while connected?
pushes DNS configuration from the server to a per-platform script (or NRPT table on Windows) so lookups are handled through the tunnel, supporting split-DNS setups rather than only an all-or-nothing route
Can a server change routing or DNS for connected clients without dropping their sessions?
sends a control-channel update message that applies the new configuration in place, avoiding the reconnect a client would otherwise need
Is a large deployment's data channel protected against key-reuse limits over long-lived connections?
uses the newer data key and packet format, tracking usage and enforcing the cipher's safe limits so keys are rotated before that threshold is hit
Can a single process serve clients arriving over different addresses, ports, or protocols at once?
lets one server listen on multiple sockets concurrently, configured with repeated local-address statements, instead of running a separate process per listener
Who or what is connecting to this server, and from what kind of system?
records each client's OS release string and sends it to the server, giving an administrator a way to see what platform a given connection came from
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for OpenVPN, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail OpenVPN puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
11 entries
No entries match these filters.
- September 20261
- August 20261
- April 20261
- March 20261
- February 20261
- January 20251
- June 20241
- March 20241
- February 20241
- November 20231
- August 20231
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in OpenVPN/openvpn, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 33 +3 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 5 +0 joined · −1 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 2 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 96% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 3.8 days first maintainer reply 13 hours
- Open backlog 181 of 687 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 3 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 181
- Contributors / month 7
- Commits / month 27
- Stars 14,550
- bugs 21%
- features 17%
- questions 4%
- docs 1%
- other 57%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.