P0 Security
Agents are redefining sensitive access and P0 is leveraging AI to extend coverage just as fast (2026-09-08) commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on P0 Security's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
P0 Security delivers runtime access control for AI, built on a proven runtime authorization platform for humans and machines. Discover the agents operating across your environment and the identities, tools and privileges they use.
Summary
P0 Security is a commercial identity-access tool that delivers cloud-native identity and access management (IAMIAMIdentity and Access Management — a framework of policies and services for controlling who can authenticate to systems and what resources they are authorized to use, letting cyber tools enforce least-privilege and audit access.) solutions, offering comprehensive access governance for human and machine identities. Its function is aimed at identity governance practitioners, and it manages access for both human and machine identities. The tool is available as a service and its documentation positions it alongside other cloud-iam solutions. P0 Security launched in 2022 and has had two releases within the tracked window, with the last one occurring ten days ago.
P0 Security delivers runtime access control for AI, built on a proven runtime authorization platform for humans and machines. Discover the agents operating across your environment and the identities, tools and privileges they use.
How P0 Security helps
Which human and machine identities have standing access they no longer need?
audits granted permissions against actual usage and flags entitlements nobody is exercising, so the reader can see exactly who or what to cut
Who has privileged access right now, and for how long?
shows current grants as time-bounded, just-in-time approvals rather than permanent roles, so standing privilege is visible instead of hidden in a policy document
Which cloud accounts have identities with access nobody approved?
reconciles configured entitlements against approval records across the tracked cloud accounts and names the identities whose access has no matching approval
Can a given identity's access be traced back to a business justification?
ties each grant to the request that produced it, so an auditor can pull the reason behind any permission instead of just the permission itself
Are machine identities held to the same access rules as human ones?
applies the same governance checks to service accounts and workload identities as to people, and reports the two populations side by side rather than treating machines as exempt
Languages
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for P0 Security, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail P0 Security puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Website history
p0.dev, every changeP0 Security's home page and 39 more pages as they looked each month from March 2023 to October 2026: 50 renders, 4 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Coverage
Missing something? Tell us
What P0 Security connects to, runs on and detects, read from its release notes and docs. So far: 1 new integration.
1 change, tracked since Sep 8, 2026.
-
Sep 82026
new Salesforce connector
With Cloudflare, Grafana Cloud, Datadog
P0 now supports connectors for Salesforce, Cloudflare, Grafana Cloud and Datadog, extending Zero Standing Privilege controls for users and agents beyond cloud infrastructure into broader workforce application coverage.
Observability & monitoring 2
Cloud platforms & services 1
Other 1
Nothing first seen in this window. That doesn't mean P0 Security shipped nothing, only that we found no record of it.
How we count
Read from 1 of 1 release notes and docs updates we hold for P0 Security. "First seen" is the earliest note that names something; "last" is the latest. Our history may start partway through P0 Security's life, so an old integration can show a recent first-seen date.
Each change counts once: "added 40 checks" is one line, so the numbers measure how often coverage moves, not how big the catalogue is or how well it detects.
Releases
1 entry
No entries match these filters.
- September 20261
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.
Choose a badge style and copy the code →