Rapid7 Cyber GRC
commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Rapid7 Cyber GRC's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Rapid7 Cyber GRC platform helps organizations manage cybersecurity governance, risk, and compliance across their IT environments.
Summary
Rapid7 Cyber GRC is a commercial integrated-risk-management platform, run as a SaaSSaaSSoftware delivered over the internet and run on the provider's infrastructure, so the buyer pays a subscription instead of installing or operating anything locally. service, that helps organizations automate the collection and validation of compliance evidence rather than gathering it by hand. It pulls employee lifecycle data through a Workday integration, checks single sign-onsingle sign-onSingle sign-on, using one identity provider to sign in to multiple applications. It reduces separate passwords and centralizes account and access management. configurations against expected Authentication Provider URIs, and structures audit and control work into guided, step-by-step tasks, which points it at compliance owners and GRC teams rather than at engineers doing hands-on security testing. It sits in the integrated-risk-management category, addressing the evidence-gathering and audit-prep work organizations otherwise split across spreadsheets and point tools. Launched in 2016, it has been in continuous commercial use since.
Rapid7 Cyber GRC platform helps organizations manage cybersecurity governance, risk, and compliance across their IT environments.
Rapid7 Cyber GRC publishes no documentation we track, so the description above is written from general knowledge rather than the vendor's own words.
How Rapid7 Cyber GRC helps
Have any employees kept access after leaving, or started without the right accounts provisioned?
cross-references Workday employee lifecycle events against account and access records to flag joiners, movers, and leavers whose evidence trail doesn't match
Is single sign-on actually configured the way the audit says it is?
checks the live Authentication Provider URI against the expected configuration and flags mismatches automatically, instead of relying on a screenshot supplied once a year
Which audit tasks are still sitting with the wrong owner or stuck mid-collection?
breaks control and audit work into guided, step-by-step tasks that show status and ownership, so gaps surface before an auditor asks
Do we have to re-collect the same employee lifecycle evidence for every framework we're audited against?
pulls it once through the Workday integration and reuses it across the evidence requests it satisfies, rather than gathering it by hand each time
Where did a piece of compliance evidence actually come from?
ties each item of evidence back to the integration or task that produced it, so a reviewer can trace a control back to its source instead of a spreadsheet cell
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Rapid7 Cyber GRC, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Rapid7 Cyber GRC puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Commercials
pricing & packaging history · Rapid7 vendor page13 readings of Rapid7's pricing page since Oct 2021, with 1 relaunch of its plan lineup and 2 changes to what its plans include — each one dated, compared with the reading before it, and explained for someone buying the tool.
Pricing and packaging history is included with Researcher and Business. See how every vendor we track sells, and how that has changed over time, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Plans by offering
Each offering on the pricing page links to its own page of plans, read at its latest capture.
Plan relaunches
Plans, prices and descriptions are quoted from the vendor's own pricing page as we read it on each date. A plan missing from a later reading is shown as no longer listed on the page — a statement about the page, not the product. Readings that failed to show any plans are left out rather than read as a change.
Website history
metasploit.com, every changeRapid7's home page and 4 more pages as they looked each month from August 2021 to October 2026: 37 renders, 0 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
3 entries
No entries match these filters.
- September 20263
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.
Choose a badge style and copy the code →