smbmap
v1.10.5 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on smbmap's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Enumerates Samba share drives across networks, supporting share listing, permission checks, file upload/download, and remote command execution.
smbmap -H <target_host> --csv > shares.csv smbmap -H <target_host> -p 'ADMIN*' --csv smbmap -H <target_host> -u <username> -p <password> --output-format csv smbmap -H <target_host> -u <username> -p <password> --pattern 'ADMIN' --output-format csv smbmap -H target -u user -d domain --kerberos smbmap -H 192.168.1.100 -u user smbmap -H 192.168.1.0/24 -u user cat hosts.txt | smbmap -f - -u user
Summary
smbmap is an open-source command-line tool that enumerates Samba shares across a Windows domain, listing drives, permissions, and share contents, with support for uploading, downloading, and deleting files and executing remote commands. It is free to use, installed via pip, and run directly from a terminal against a host or a file of hosts. The README frames it explicitly for penetration testers, useful for spotting writable shares and sensitive files across large networks rather than for ongoing monitoring. It also supports pass-the-hash and KerberosKerberosA network authentication protocol that uses tickets issued by a trusted service. Users and services can prove their identities without sending a password to each application. authentication, SMB signing detection, and regex-based content searching across shares, putting it alongside other SMB enumeration utilities used during internal network assessments rather than any named competitor. First committed in 2014 and still maintained by 21 contributors, though activity has slowed to two commits in the past year and the last release was over seven months ago.
Enumerates Samba share drives across networks, supporting share listing, permission checks, file upload/download, and remote command execution.
How smbmap helps
Which shares across these hosts let me read or write files I shouldn't be able to touch?
connects with the given credentials (or a null session) and lists every share alongside its permission level, flagging READ and WRITE access so writable shares stand out immediately
Where in this pile of shares is the sensitive file I'm looking for?
walks share contents recursively, matching file names against a pattern or searching file contents by regex across every host, so a single pass surfaces the file wherever it sits
Can I get into these hosts without a working password?
authenticates with a password hash or a Kerberos ticket instead of a cleartext password, and separately reports whether a null session succeeds, so access routes short of a real password are visible
Which of these servers would let an attacker relay or downgrade an SMB connection?
checks each host for SMB signing support and reports it per host, marking targets where the protection is absent
Is this foothold enough to run commands on the target, not just read files?
attempts remote command execution through the established session and returns the output, showing whether the access level reaches beyond file listing
Which hosts on this list are even worth investigating by hand?
works through a file of IPs, hostnames, or CIDR ranges and reports per host how many sessions were established and authenticated, separating hosts that answered but denied access from ones that yielded real share access
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for smbmap, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail smbmap puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
6 entries
No entries match these filters.
- September 20241
- May 20242
- November 20232
- May 20231
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in ShawnDEvans/smbmap, 2023-12 – 2026-11, as of 2026-11-03. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 1 −2 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 0 +0 joined · −1 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 0 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 212 days first maintainer reply 2.4 days
- Open backlog 22 of 76 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 1 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 22
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 2,082
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.