WPScan
v4.2.0 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on WPScan's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Scans WordPress sites for vulnerabilities, enumerating plugins, themes, users, and misconfigurations via the WPScan vulnerability database.
wpscan --url https://target.tld --max-response-size 64 cli_options: url: 'https://target.tld' max_response_size: 64 wpscan --url https://target.tld --enterprise-db-token <your-enterprise-token> --enumerate vp,vt cli_options: enterprise_db_token: "<your-enterprise-token>" url: "https://target.tld" wpscan --url https://example.com -e ap --format jsonl | tee scan.jsonl | jq . wpscan --url https://example.com -e ap,vp --format sarif -o wpscan.sarif cat /tmp/wordlist.txt | wpscan --url https://example.com --wordlist - wpscan --url https://example.com --log my_scan_output.log wpscan --url https://example.com --cache-dir /path/to/cache wpscan --url https://example.com --disable-tls-checks wpscan --url https://example.com --throttle 0.5
Summary
WPScan is an open-source, free command-line scanner that black-box tests WordPress sites for vulnerabilities, enumerating plugins, themes, users, and backup folders against a known vulnerability database. It is built for penetration testers and security teams auditing WordPress installations rather than for developers securing their own code as they write it. Scans can run authenticated via WordPress Application Password auth for a fuller plugin and theme inventory, and results stream out in real time in formats including SARIFSARIFStatic Analysis Results Interchange Format, a standard for sharing code-analysis findings, including locations and rule details. It lets scanners report results to a common review interface. and JSONLJSONLA text format where each line is a self-contained, valid JSON object, making it easy to stream, append, and process large datasets line by line without parsing a full JSON array into memory. for feeding CI pipelines or GitHub Code Scanning; an enterprise database token also lets scans run against a local vulnerability data dump instead of the rate-limited online API. It sits in the WordPress-specific corner of vulnerability scanning, with no comparable product named in its own documentation. First committed in 2012, it remains active, with 78 contributors and a release in the last month.
Scans WordPress sites for vulnerabilities, enumerating plugins, themes, users, and misconfigurations via the WPScan vulnerability database.
How WPScan helps
Which known vulnerabilities does this WordPress installation expose right now?
checks the detected core version, plugins, and themes against the WPScan vulnerability database and lists each match with its proof-of-concept details, though it only knows what the database has recorded
Which plugins and themes are actually running on this site, including ones I forgot about?
enumerates installed plugins and themes from the outside, streaming each one it finds along with active install counts and last-updated dates pulled from the WordPress.org API
Which usernames can an attacker enumerate from this site?
walks author IDs and login responses to reveal valid WordPress usernames without needing credentials
Have I left old backup or configuration files reachable on this server?
probes for common backup folder paths and reports any that resolve, exposing files that were never meant to be public
Would authenticating change what this scan finds on my own site?
when given WordPress Application Password credentials, re-enumerates plugins and themes from an authenticated view for a fuller inventory than an anonymous scan can see
Can this scan's results feed straight into my CI pipeline's security gate?
streams findings as SARIF or line-by-line JSON as they're discovered, so a pipeline can ingest them into GitHub Code Scanning or another processor without waiting for the scan to finish
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for WPScan, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail WPScan puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
15 entries
No entries match these filters.
- October 20261
- July 20261
- May 20261
- January 20211
- March 20201
- February 20201
- November 20191
- July 20191
- March 20191
- June 20181
- July 20171
- November 20161
- May 20161
- October 20151
- June 20151
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in wpscanteam/wpscan, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 10 +6 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 2 +2 joined · −2 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 2 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 711 days first maintainer reply 9.9 days
- Open backlog 0 of 1,476 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 0
- Contributors / month 1
- Commits / month 1
- Stars 9,777
- features 11%
- other 89%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Articles
1 article · updated Nov 4, 2026Where WPScan turns up in what others publish: how-tos, attack reports that name it, and incident write-ups. A row says why it is here and quotes where the article names it; the link goes to the publisher.
Tutorials & guides 1
-
WPScan: WordPress Pentesting Framework
In this article, we’ll try to deface such WordPress websites, with one of the most powerful WordPress vulnerability Scanner i.e WPScan.
2 more quotes
Thus, to enumerate such web-applications, we’ll be using “WPScan” – which is a black box vulnerability scanner for WordPress, scripted in Ruby to focus on different vulnerabilities that are present in the WordPress…
Well, WPScan comes preinstalled in Kali Linux, SamuraiWTF, Pentoo, BlackArch; which scans up its database in order to find out the outdated versions and the vulnerabilities in the target’s web application.
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.