xnLinkFinder
v8.1 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on xnLinkFinder's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Discovers endpoints, parameters, wordlists, and secrets for a target by crawling URLs, directories, Burp/ZAP/HARHARAn HTTP Archive file, a JSON-format log of all network requests and responses captured by a browser's developer tools, used by cyber tools to replay, inspect, or analyze web traffic without re-running a live session. files, or waymore results.
xnLinkFinder -i https://example.com -rp http://127.0.0.1:8080 xnLinkFinder -i https://example.com -rp proxies.txt python3 xnLinkFinder.py -i https://example.com -o links.txt -os secrets.json xnLinkFinder -i https://example.com -mrs 10 xnLinkFinder -i https://target-blog.example.com -ro -d target-blog.example.com python xnLinkFinder.py -i https://example.com --heap xnLinkFinder -i session.har xnLinkFinder -i https://target.example.com -r 5 python3 xnLinkFinder.py -i https://target.example.com -rl 5 xnLinkFinder -i <waymore_output_dir> -d 0 python3 xnLinkFinder.py -i https://target.com -cl # In config.yml, add or trim entries under commonTLDs: # commonTLDs: # - com # - io # - net xnLinkFinder -i https://example.com xnLinkFinder -uc 'CustomBot/1.0' https://example.com
Summary
xnLinkFinder is an open-source command-line tool for reconnaissance that discovers endpoints, parameters, wordlist candidates, and hardcoded secrets for a given target, and it costs nothing to use. It runs as a Python script installed via pip or pipx, and it accepts input from a live crawl of one or many URLs, a local directory or file, or exports from Burp, ZAP, Caido, HAR recordings, and waymore results. It's aimed at penetration testers and bug bounty hunters doing attack surfaceattack surfaceThe exposed systems, interfaces and access points an attacker could try to use. It includes internet-facing services as well as identities, software and other reachable resources. mapping, and its README traces its lineage to Gerben Javado's LinkFinder, whose regex-based approach it extends with browser heap snapshot analysis, PDF and OCROCROptical character recognition, converting text in an image or scanned document into machine-readable characters. It lets software search or process text that was stored as pixels. extraction, and detection for AWS keys, JWTsJWTsJSON Web Tokens — an open standard (RFC 7519) for encoding claims as a signed, optionally encrypted JSON object. Cyber tools use them for stateless authentication without server-side session storage., and other secret formats. First committed in 2022, it remains active with four contributors and 30 commits in the past year.
Discovers endpoints, parameters, wordlists, and secrets for a target by crawling URLs, directories, Burp/ZAP/HAR files, or waymore results.
How xnLinkFinder helps
Which endpoints and parameters does this target actually expose beyond what a static crawl would show?
crawls the target or its exported traffic, extracts links and parameters from responses (including JS, HTML form fields, and dynamically generated URLs captured from a browser's memory), and lists them for further testing
Did this application leak any credentials or tokens in its responses?
scans crawled content for patterns matching AWS keys, GitHub tokens, JWTs, Stripe keys, private keys, database connection strings and similar formats, and can write them to a file grouped by type and value with the source URL and count
What attack surface can I pull out of a HAR file, Burp/ZAP/Caido export, or archived waymore data instead of crawling live?
reads links, parameters and requests directly out of those file formats without touching the target, letting the same extraction run offline against captured traffic
What would a target-specific wordlist for this app look like, built from its own naming conventions?
derives candidate words from discovered paths and parameters, including correct plural forms, to produce a wordlist tailored to that target rather than a generic list
Can I map an authenticated app's traffic without also hoovering up its blog or CMS platform's own script and stylesheet links?
can restrict extraction to human-visible page content, stripping script, style and template tags first so only the page's own outbound links are reported
Will crawling this target get me blocked or blow through a bug bounty program's rate limit?
supports a requests-per-second cap and automatic retries on timeouts or 429/5xx responses, and can route traffic through a proxy or list of proxies to spread out the load
Languages
Command line
No command matches.
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for xnLinkFinder, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail xnLinkFinder puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
25 entries
No entries match these filters.
- January 20268
- December 20254
- October 20252
- September 20252
- April 20252
- March 20252
- February 20253
- May 20242
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in xnl-h4ck3r/xnLinkFinder, 2023-12 – 2026-11, as of 2026-11-03. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 1 −1 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 1 +0 joined · −0 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 1 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close not measured first maintainer reply 15 hours
- Open backlog 3 of 36 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 3
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 1,594
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.