driftnet
1.2.0 open-sourceThe section your link pointed to isn't on driftnet's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Driftnet watches network traffic, and picks out and displays JPEG and GIF images for display
Summary
driftnet is an open-source packet-sniffing tool that watches network traffic and reconstructs JPEG, GIF, PNG and WebP images (plus MPEG audio) as they cross the wire, displaying them in a GTKGTKA cross-platform widget toolkit maintained by the GNOME project for building graphical user interfaces in C, with bindings for many languages, giving cyber tools a native desktop UI without writing platform-specific rendering code. window or a browser-based HTTP/websockets viewer. It runs as a desktop application on Unix systems, built against libpcap and standard image libraries, either sniffing live traffic or reading from a pcappcapA packet capture, recorded network packets that can be inspected later. Analysts use it to reconstruct communication and investigate protocol behavior or suspicious traffic. dump file. It suits penetration testers and network analysts who need to see, rather than just log, what images are passing over a network segment they can observe. The README frames this bluntly as an invasion of privacy rather than positioning it against named competitors, and it sits in a niche of its own within passive network forensics tools. Its history runs back to 2001 with 12 contributors, but there have been no commits in the past year and only one release in recent tracking, so treat it as stable rather than actively developed.
Driftnet watches network traffic, and picks out and displays JPEG and GIF images for display
How driftnet helps
What images have crossed this network segment while I was watching it?
reassembles JPEG, GIF, PNG and WebP data straight out of the captured packets and displays each picture as it completes, in the GTK window or the browser viewer
What is someone on this network listening to right now?
pulls MPEG audio streams out of the same traffic and plays them back as they're captured
Can I see what was in a capture I already took, without being on the wire?
reads a saved pcap dump file instead of a live interface and replays the same image and audio reconstruction against it
Are images being sent inside HTTP POST bodies, not just ordinary downloads?
inspects HTTP POST content in addition to plain responses, so uploads on the segment surface as images too
Is anything worth seeing hidden in traffic on an 802.11 network I'm monitoring?
understands radiotap and 802.11 headers so images can be pulled out of wireless capture, not only wired Ethernet frames
Can I watch this from another machine instead of the box doing the capture?
offers an HTTP and websockets based viewer alongside the GTK window, so the reconstructed images can be watched from a browser on another host
Languages
Command line
| option | found in | since | description |
|---|
Values are placeholders taken from each option’s declared default. Nothing is executed here — the output shown is a recording of a run that already happened.
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
- Community health
-
Contributor trend distinct committers, this year against last
-
Maintainer concentration bus factor now against a year ago
-
Issue backlog trend issues closed per issue opened, 12 months
-
Responsiveness median time to a maintainer’s first reply
Nine scores for driftnet, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail driftnet puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Releases
5 entries
No entries match these filters.
- September 20261
- August 20263
- September 20181
Project health
Issue, contributor and maintainer activity in deiv/driftnet, 2023-10 – 2026-09, as of 2026-09-25. Twelve-month figures first; the trend lines run the whole window.
- Contributors 0 −1 vs prior 12 months
- Maintainers 0 +0 joined · −1 left, last 12 months
- Bus factor 0 committers behind half the commits
- Community-filed 100% of issues opened, last 12 months
- Median time to close 8.2 years first maintainer reply 43 hours
- Open backlog 5 of 32 issues ever filed
- Issues opened / month 0 · 0 communitymaintainers
- Open backlog 5
- Contributors / month 0
- Commits / month 0
- Stars 471
- other 100%
Counts from the project's public repository and git history; no individuals are identified. Maintainers are the committers covering 80% of the last year's commits. how we measure this
Libraries its release ships
What its latest release locks, checked against known advisories.None of its release's images build from a lockfile we can read.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.