RoboForm
changelog-20261031-25cd6930 commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on RoboForm's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
RoboForm is a password manager for Windows that securely stores, organizes, and autofills passwords and online forms across websites and applications.
Summary
RoboForm is a commercial password manager that runs as a client on Windows and syncs credentials through a hosted account, making it usable across multiple machines rather than tied to one device. Beyond storing and autofilling logins, it handles migration from other password managers, including a direct import path for Dashlane's Safenotes, which matters to anyone consolidating tools rather than starting fresh. This positions it for individual users and small offices who want credential management without deploying infrastructure, sitting in the identity-access category alongside other consumer-facing password managers rather than enterprise identity platforms. It has been around since 1999, and while its release cadence is slow, with one tracked update in the current window landing 68 days ago, it is still being maintained.
RoboForm is a password manager for Windows that securely stores, organizes, and autofills passwords and online forms across websites and applications.
How RoboForm helps
Which of my saved logins can I fill into a site without retyping them?
matches stored credentials to the page open in the browser and fills the username and password fields automatically, cutting out manual entry
Are my passwords available on the other machines I work from?
syncs the encrypted credential store through a hosted account so the same entries show up on every device it is installed on
Can I bring my existing Dashlane vault over without re-entering everything?
reads Safenotes exported from Dashlane and imports them directly into the credential store, preserving the notes as part of switching tools
Which of my accounts still use weak or reused passwords?
organizes stored logins so they can be reviewed together, letting a person spot repeats and weak entries across sites
How do I fill in a long web form without retyping my details each time?
recognizes form fields on a page and populates them from saved identity data, not just login screens
Languages
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for RoboForm, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail RoboForm puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Website history
roboform.com, every changeRoboForm (Siber Systems)'s home page and 7 more pages as they looked each month from September 2021 to October 2026: 20 renders, 4 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
62 entries
No entries match these filters.
- October 20262
- July 20261
- April 20261
- April 20251
- October 20241
- April 20241
- March 20241
- January 20231
- November 20221
- July 20221
- January 20221
- July 20211
- April 20211
- November 20201
- October 20201
- July 20201
- April 20201
- March 20201
- October 20191
- July 20191
- June 20191
- March 20191
- February 20191
- September 20181
- May 20181
- April 20181
- December 20171
- November 20171
- October 20171
- August 20171
- June 20171
- April 20171
- March 20171
- February 20171
- December 20164
- November 20161
- September 20161
- December 20151
- September 20151
- August 20151
- April 20151
- December 20141
- November 20141
- August 20141
- June 20141
- April 20141
- February 20141
- January 20141
- September 20131
- May 20131
- February 20131
- November 20121
- August 20121
- July 20121
- May 20121
- March 20121
- February 20121
- January 20121
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.
Choose a badge style and copy the code →