Straiker
CARLIY0S: CyberCartel's AI Attacks on Latin American Banks (2026-10-21) commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Straiker's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Straiker discovers and inventories enterprise AI agents, tests them with automated red teaming and protects them with runtime guardrails.
Summary
Straiker is a commercial ai-security tool that discovers, inventories, and tests enterprise AI agents while applying runtime guardrails. It runs as a service and is for red teamers, focusing on agentic-ai-security within the broader cyber tool(s) category. Its documentation positions it alongside agentic-ai-security solutions, and it was launched in 2024.
Straiker discovers and inventories enterprise AI agents, tests them with automated red teaming and protects them with runtime guardrails.
How Straiker helps
Which AI agents are running across our environment that nobody registered with security?
discovers agents in use across the enterprise and builds an inventory of them, surfacing ones that were never formally onboarded
Which of our deployed agents would give up sensitive data or take a harmful action if pushed?
runs automated red-team attacks against each agent, including prompt-injection attempts, and reports which prompts or techniques broke through
Is a live agent about to leak something or get manipulated right now, not just in a test?
applies runtime guardrails that sit in front of the agent's traffic, catching and blocking risky prompts and responses as they happen
Which of our agents have never been security-tested at all?
cross-references the inventory of discovered agents against the ones that have been through red-team testing, naming the gaps
Which prompt-injection techniques actually work against our specific agents, not just in general?
runs a library of adversarial prompts against each agent and records which ones succeeded, tied to the agent that failed them
Are the guardrails we've put in place actually stopping the attacks we're worried about?
replays the red-team attack set against the guarded agent and shows which attempts the runtime protection catches versus lets through
Languages
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Straiker, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Straiker puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Website history
straiker.ai, every changeStraiker's home page and 20 more pages as they looked each month from March 2024 to October 2026: 93 renders, 30 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Coverage
Missing something? Tell us
What Straiker connects to, runs on and detects, read from its release notes and docs. So far: 2 new detections, 2 new integrations.
4 changes, tracked since Oct 16, 2026.
-
Oct 212026
new CARLIY0S / CyberCartel (Tr4nsHack Team / AiPT-67) threat intelligence
With Hexagon Security Labs Mexico, PentAGI, CARLIY0S_consolidated.py
Straiker uncovered CARLIY0S, a system used by CyberCartel to coordinate attacks against banks and payment providers across Latin America. The group assigned different roles to commercial AI models to analyze targets, develop attacks, and coordinate operations.
-
Oct 212026
new Model provider coordination and credential revocation — Anthropic and xAI
With Claude, Grok
Prior to publication, Straiker shared the relevant indicators with the affected AI providers. Anthropic has since revoked the compromised credential used to reach Claude, cutting off the swarm's access. xAI has been notified and is actively looking into the activity associated with the five "Grok miners."
-
Oct 162026
new Adversarial Resilience testing for AI agents via Ascend AI
With prompt injection, tool misuse, data leakage, OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic Security Initiative, MITRE ATLAS
Ascend AI probes each agent for prompt injection, tool misuse, data leakage, and other attack paths drawn from the OWASP LLM Top 10, the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative, and MITRE ATLAS.
-
Oct 162026
new Straiker Ascend AI integration with Workday Agent Passport
With Workday Marketplace
Straiker plans to connect its Ascend AI red-teaming platform to Workday Agent Passport, the trust layer of Workday's Agent System of Record, so that AI agents built by Workday customers and partners can carry verifiable evidence of how they were tested, by whom, and against which Workday-defined criteria.
Model providers & gateways 4
Identity & access 1
Other 1
Nothing first seen in this window. That doesn't mean Straiker shipped nothing, only that we found no record of it.
How we count
Read from 2 of 8 release notes and docs updates we hold for Straiker. "First seen" is the earliest note that names something; "last" is the latest. Our history may start partway through Straiker's life, so an old integration can show a recent first-seen date.
Each change counts once: "added 40 checks" is one line, so the numbers measure how often coverage moves, not how big the catalogue is or how well it detects.
Releases
8 entries
No entries match these filters.
- October 20263
- September 20262
- August 20262
- July 20261
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.
Choose a badge style and copy the code →