Token Security
Token Security Brings Claude Compliance API Into Its Identity Control Plane | Token Security (2026-08-06) commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Token Security's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Token Security is a blockchain security analysis platform that audits smart contracts and tokens for vulnerabilities, scams, and security risks.
Summary
Token Security is a commercial identity-access cyber tool that maps and analyzes non-human and AI agent identities across cloud, SaaSSaaSSoftware delivered over the internet and run on the provider's infrastructure, so the buyer pays a subscription instead of installing or operating anything locally., and secrets by ingesting signals from various sources. It is run as a service accessible via a portal or external AI chat applications, and it is intended for platform engineers and compliance owners. Its documentation positions it alongside tools that manage identity-access risk. Having launched in 2023, the tool has released twice in the last month.
Token Security is a blockchain security analysis platform that audits smart contracts and tokens for vulnerabilities, scams, and security risks.
How Token Security helps
Which Anthropic API keys exist across our environment and who owns them?
traces each key from creation in Claude through storage in repository secrets, invocation by CI/CD pipelines, and execution inside cloud workloads, flagging ones without a clear owner
Which of our Claude credentials are stale, over-privileged, or sitting unrotated?
scores Claude-related identity posture alongside other non-human identities and lists stale keys, abandoned workspaces, and unrotated credentials
What could an attacker reach if this Claude identity were compromised?
correlates Claude activity with cloud, SaaS, source control, CI/CD, and MCP context in a unified identity graph and traces the blast radius from that one identity
Which MCP servers and AI agent processes are actually running in our environment?
continuously scans endpoints through CrowdStrike and other endpoint integrations to inventory MCP servers and agent processes without deploying new agents
Which MCP configuration files contain hardcoded secrets, and where do those secrets lead?
pulls configuration files such as desktop and project MCP configs from endpoints, scans them for embedded API keys and plaintext tokens, correlates each to an identity, and redacts the value in the UI
Which service accounts in one cloud are quietly being used by resources in another?
answers plain-language cross-environment questions by walking the identity graph across clouds and naming the specific accounts and resources involved
Languages
Media
Videos from the release notes, newest first. They play right here.Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Token Security, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Token Security puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Website history
token.security, every changeToken Security's home page and 32 more pages as they looked each month from December 2023 to October 2026: 41 renders, 6 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
8 entries
No entries match these filters.
- October 20264
- August 20264
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.