Black Duck
Introducing Signal Agentic Fix: Your 24×7 remediation team (2026-10-27) commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Black Duck's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Black Duck is a software composition analysissoftware composition analysisSoftware composition analysis, identifying third-party dependencies and checking them for known vulnerabilities and license issues. It covers software a team uses rather than writes itself. tool that identifies and manages open source components, vulnerabilities, and licensing risks in applications.
[LLM]
mode = byo
uri = https://your-endpoint.example.com/v1
key = ${OPENAI_API_KEY}
timeout = 600
[LLM_SINGLEFILESCAN_AGENT]
model = gpt-4o
timeout = 600
[LLM_DATAFLOW_AGENT]
model = gpt-4o-mini
[LLM_OVERSIGHT_AGENT]
model = gpt-4o-mini
[LLM_EXPLOITATION_AGENT]
model = gpt-4o-mini
[LLM_SCA_AGENT]
model = gpt-4o-mini
[LLM_MERGEKEY_EMBED_AGENT]
model = text-embedding-3-large
[LLM_OVERSIGHT_EMBED_AGENT]
model = text-embedding-3-small
[LLM]
mode = byo
gcp_service_account_key = gcp-sa-key.json
gcp_project = your-gcp-project-id
Summary
Black Duck is a commercial appsec platform that combines software composition analysis, SBOMSBOMA software bill of materials, an inventory of the components and versions inside an application. It helps teams find affected software when a dependency has a vulnerability or licensing issue. generation, and license compliance checking to find and manage risk in open-source and third-party code, run as a hosted service that plugs into CI pipelines rather than installed as a standalone scanner. Teams reach it through GitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsGitHub's built-in CI/CD system that runs automated workflows triggered by repository events, letting cyber tools automate testing, building, and releasing without managing separate pipeline infrastructure., GitLab CI, Bitbucket Pipelines, Jenkins, or Azure DevOps via its Bridge CLI, and it can tunnel outbound-only into self-hosted Azure DevOps Server, GitLab Self-Managed, Bitbucket Server, and on-premises Jira without firewall changes. It's built for application security and compliance teams who need policy enforcement across an organization rather than per-repo configuration, with central rule profiles, RBACRBACRole-based access control, where permissions are assigned to roles such as reader or administrator and users receive those roles. It makes access easier to manage than individual permission lists., and audit trails, plus bidirectional ticket sync into Jira, ServiceNow, and Azure Boards. Originally launched in 2002, it remains under active development, with its most recent release shipping this week.
Black Duck is a software composition analysis tool that identifies and manages open source components, vulnerabilities, and licensing risks in applications.
How Black Duck helps
Which open-source components in this application carry known vulnerabilities?
scans declared and transitive dependencies across package managers and reports matches against known vulnerability data, tied to the specific manifest or lockfile that pulled each one in
Which of my dependencies carry license terms my organization doesn't allow?
checks each detected component's license against configured policy and flags violations before merge, scoped at organization, application, project, or branch level
Does this pull request introduce a new risk that wasn't there before?
scans on push and merge-request activity and decorates the PR with a severity breakdown, so a reviewer sees new findings against the existing baseline rather than a full re-audit
Which policies actually applied to a given finding, and who signed off on it?
shows the rule profiles and compliance requirements attached to each finding along with an audit trail of which profile version scored the scan and who owns it
Are all my teams' pipelines judging code against the same rules?
central rule profiles inherit down from organization to branch and are enforced automatically across CI, CLI, and integrations, with each scan recording which profile it used so an outdated or overridden copy is visible
Has a dismissed vulnerability or license issue quietly come back?
closes the linked ticket automatically when a finding disappears from a scan, and opens a fresh ticket if it reappears later, preserving the audit history instead of reopening the old one
Languages
Screenshots
From the release notes, newest first. Click one to see it full size.Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Black Duck, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Black Duck puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Website history
blackduck.com, every changeBlack Duck's home and product pages and 39 more pages as they looked each month from November 2021 to October 2026: 52 renders, 7 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
6 entries
No entries match these filters.
- October 20262
- September 20262
- August 20262
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.