Certiv
Token Spend Is a Potential Signal for a Rogue Agent commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Certiv's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Certiv is an AI agent assurance platform for endpoints that discovers every agent, monitors activity in real time, and enforces policy before risky actions execute.
Summary
Certiv is a commercial AI security product that enforces spend and access controls on AI agents running across company endpoints, deployed as a single install called Scout that works alongside existing device management tools. Beyond discovery, it lets teams set per-endpoint dollar budgets against negotiated contract rates, with Report, Notify, and Block modes that let a security or IT team watch consumption before deciding to stop a runaway agent's prompts at the endpoint; a simulation feature checks a proposed threshold against historical usage first, so enforcement doesn't surprise anyone. A separate Privacy Mode keeps compliant agent sessions hidden from security teams by default, logging who accesses one and why, which points to compliance and governance owners as much as security staff.
Certiv is an AI agent assurance platform for endpoints that discovers every agent, monitors activity in real time, and enforces policy before risky actions execute.
How Certiv helps
Which AI agents are running on our endpoints right now, and what are they actually doing?
a single endpoint install builds a live catalog of agents, tools, MCP servers, and LLMs in use, scored for risk and updated as sessions run, including agents nobody registered or approved
Is one of our agents currently being manipulated or exfiltrating data?
the policy engine reads the session as a whole rather than isolated events, flagging deviations like out-of-scope credential calls or data staged for an external post, and can block the action before it executes
Which agent sessions actually need a security reviewer's attention today?
with Privacy Mode enabled, only sessions that tripped a policy violation are surfaced automatically, while compliant sessions stay hidden until someone records a justified reason to view them
Who looked at a private, compliant agent session, and why?
every access to a session hidden by Privacy Mode is logged with the reviewer's identity and their recorded justification, giving compliance and works councils an audit trail
Which endpoints or agents are burning through model spend faster than expected?
session-level token attribution breaks down cost by agent, endpoint, user, and model with historical trend views, so an abnormal consumption pattern is visible before it becomes a budget problem
Which endpoint would have blown its budget if we'd enforced a limit last month?
budget simulation replays historical usage against a proposed per-endpoint dollar threshold, showing how often it would have fired before you switch that endpoint into blocking mode
Languages
Command line
1 command for Certiv, each with where it came from. This tool has no source analysis yet, so there is no option reference and no captured run beside them.
No command matches.
Screenshots
From the release notes, newest first. Click one to see it full size.Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Certiv, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Certiv puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Website history
certiv.ai, every changeCertiv's home page and 16 more pages as they looked each month from April 2026 to October 2026: 19 renders, 1 change of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
5 entries
No entries match these filters.
- September 20262
- August 20262
- July 20261
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.