Reality Defender
changelog-20261018-05b58742 commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Reality Defender's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Reality Defender detects synthetic audio, video, images, and documents for enterprise deepfake screening.
SIGNED=$(curl -s -X POST https://api.realitydefender.com/api/files/aws-presigned -H 'Authorization: Bearer <token>' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"filename":"clip.mp4"}' | jq -r .signedUrl)
curl -X PUT "$SIGNED" -H 'Content-Type: application/octet-stream' --data-binary @clip.mp4
SIGNED=$(curl -s -X POST https://api.realitydefender.com/api/files/aws-presigned \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <token>' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"filename": "clip.mp4"}' | jq -r '.signedUrl')
curl -X PUT "$SIGNED" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/octet-stream' \
--data-binary @clip.mp4
curl --request POST \
--url https://api.prd.realitydefender.xyz/api/v2/user-feedback \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'x-api-key: <api-key>' \
--data '{}'
curl --request POST \
--url https://api.prd.realitydefender.xyz/api/files/social \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'x-api-key: <api-key>' \
--data '{}'
Summary
Reality Defender is a commercial AI security tool that helps enterprises, platforms, and institutions detect deepfakes to uphold content integrity. It does not specify licensing costs. It is accessible via a REST APIREST APIA web API design style where clients interact with resources over HTTP using standard methods like GET, POST, and DELETE, giving cyber tools a predictable, language-agnostic way to integrate with external services. and SDKs for integration, and it functions as a service for checking social media content or protecting web conferencing sessions. It is intended for developers, content moderators, and organizations focused on content authenticity. Its documentation positions it alongside resources for fraud prevention and brand safety scanning. The tool launched in 2021.
Reality Defender detects synthetic audio, video, images, and documents for enterprise deepfake screening.
How Reality Defender helps
Is this piece of audio, video, or image content synthetic or manipulated?
runs the file against detection models and returns a determination of whether it contains AI-generated or manipulated material, scoped to the media types the checking service supports
Which uploaded social media assets contain deepfakes before they reach my moderators?
submits content through the checking service and returns a per-file result, letting a moderation queue filter out flagged items ahead of human review
Is the person on this video call actually who they claim to be?
screens the real-time media stream from a conferencing session for signs of synthetic audio or video and flags manipulation as it happens
Is this caller's voice synthetic, in a contact center fraud check?
analyzes the audio channel for signs of AI-generated speech, aimed at catching voice fraud during account access or servicing calls
Did an applicant use a synthetic voice or face to open or modify an account?
applies the same detection screening to identity-verification media, surfacing manipulated submissions for fraud review
Was my organization's brand or executive likeness used in a fabricated video or image circulating online?
scans social content submitted to the service for deepfakes referencing the organization, returning flagged matches for a brand safety review
Languages
Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Reality Defender, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Reality Defender puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Website history
realitydefender.com, every changeReality Defender's home page and 30 more pages as they looked each month from May 2022 to October 2026: 41 renders, 7 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Coverage
Missing something? Tell us
What Reality Defender connects to, runs on and detects, read from its release notes and docs. So far: 1 updated integration.
1 change, tracked since Oct 18, 2026.
-
Oct 182026
updated Social media link import — TikTok and Threads support
Social media link imports now accepts TikTok tiktok.com/t/<code> short links and TikTok mobile links short links; Threads links
Chat & collaboration 1
Browsers & mobile 1
Nothing first seen in this window. That doesn't mean Reality Defender shipped nothing, only that we found no record of it.
How we count
Read from 1 of 8 release notes and docs updates we hold for Reality Defender. "First seen" is the earliest note that names something; "last" is the latest. Our history may start partway through Reality Defender's life, so an old integration can show a recent first-seen date.
Each change counts once: "added 40 checks" is one line, so the numbers measure how often coverage moves, not how big the catalogue is or how well it detects.
Releases
8 entries
No entries match these filters.
- October 20264
- September 20263
- August 20261
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.