PAGES
← all tools
◆ AI Runtime Defense & Guardrails

Lakera

changelog-20261031-3b91e91c commercial

Lakera is an AI security platform that detects and prevents prompt injectionprompt injectionAn attack where text the model reads, such as a web page, file or tool result, carries instructions that override the user's. It is the main security risk for agents with tools. attacks and other LLMLLMA large language model, a neural network trained on large amounts of text to recognize patterns and generate language. Applications use it for tasks such as answering, summarizing and writing code. vulnerabilities.

Summary

Lakera is a commercial appsec platform that inspects and guards traffic to and from AI models and agents, run as a hosted gateway service you call through a Guard API rather than something you self-host. It targets application developers building on LLMsLLMsA large language model, a neural network trained on large amounts of text to recognize patterns and generate language. Applications use it for tasks such as answering, summarizing and writing code. and the security practitioners who own the resulting policies, sitting between the model and its users to flag prompt injection, data leakage, and off-task tool calls before they reach production. Its documentation splits the product into guardrails for runtime enforcement and a separate AI Red Teaming component for adversarial testing of GenAI applications, plus an early-access AI Agent Security module that inventories agents and MCPMCPModel Context Protocol, a standard for connecting AI applications to external tools and data sources. A compatible server exposes capabilities an assistant can use through a common interface. servers across platforms like Bedrock and Copilot Studio and rates them against OWASPOWASPA nonprofit foundation that publishes open standards, guides, and ranked vulnerability lists—most famously the OWASP Top 10—giving cyber tools a vendor-neutral benchmark to test or report against. and MITRE ATLASMITRE ATLASA MITRE-maintained knowledge base of adversarial tactics and techniques targeting AI and machine learning systems, modelled on ATT&CK, giving cyber tools a structured taxonomy for AI-specific threat modelling.. Launched in 2021 and still shipping regularly, with its most recent release 34 days ago.

Lakera is an AI security platform that detects and prevents prompt injection attacks and other LLM vulnerabilities.

How Lakera helps

Which agents and MCP servers has anyone stood up across our cloud and low-code platforms without security's knowledge?

scans connected accounts on services like Bedrock, Google Cloud, Copilot Studio, Salesforce Agentforce, n8n, and Relevance AI and builds an inventory of agents and their tools, each rated Critical/High/Medium/Low with the factors behind the rating

Which of our agents are exposed to the risks security frameworks actually name?

maps each discovered agent's risk factors onto OWASP and MITRE ATLAS categories so gaps show up against a framework instead of an internal scoring scheme

Is a user's prompt actually manipulating our agent into calling a tool it shouldn't?

compares the tool call against the conversation's stated intent and flags it as off-task or as a dangerous deviation outside the agent's mandate, with reason text explaining the mismatch

Would tightening this policy have broken traffic we were fine with last month?

replays historical requests against the candidate sensitivity levels and shows the change in flagging rate by category before the policy goes live

Is a link this model is about to hand a user a phishing attempt someone smuggled into its context?

inspects outbound content for unknown or attacker-inserted links and blocks or flags them before they reach the user

Who changed a guardrail policy, and is production still enforcing what we think it is?

detail pages record creator and last-edited-by/at for every policy, and each project runs in either detection or full-enforcement mode so a policy left in detect-only shows up rather than silently passing threats through

all 9 features, with the evidence for each →

Languages

Not documented

Features

9 capabilities across 5 areas · 2 backed by code, an API document or a real run

Built from Lakera's releases, docs, README and our own runs. “Seen” marks the month we first spotted a release the vendor didn't date. Group names and tags are our labels.

Compare with peers →

What Lakera offers you

  • ML-based detection1
  • REST API1
  • Web management console1
Threat Detection and Content Safety 3 capabilities Lakera's core function is evaluating AI application traffic — across text and audio — to detect prompt injection, harmful content, and other threats before they reach the model or user. Operators can tune sensitivity and maintain allow/deny lists to match their risk tolerance.
Guard API verified Evaluates messages from any role for threats and returns per-detector confidence scores so developers can inspect what was flagged and why. 4 releases · 4 other sources · first seen Aug 2026

Also counts toward: REST API

release

  • Guard API breakdown response now includes a result field for each detector showing confidence level (l1_confident, l2_very_likely, l3_likely, l4_less_likely, l5_unlikely). updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • POST /v2/guard: response schema changed 1.0.0 · Aug 2026 · source · release history
  • New result field in Guard API breakdown responses exposes per-detector confidence levels (l1_confident through l5_unlikely), matching the granularity already available in /guard/results. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history
  • Added support for developer and tool roles in API messages to cover agentic and tool-using use cases. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history

docs

  • Skip to navigation To pin processing to one place, use a regional endpoint: https://eu.api.lakera.ai (EU) (USA) seen Oct 2026 · source
  • Skip to navigation Processed in value https://eu.api.lakera.ai eu-south-2 USA us-east-1 Singapore, Asia ap-southeast-1 https://api.lakera.ai Closest of the above any of the above [eu-south-2] https://eu.api.lakera.ai us.api.lakera.ai docs update · Oct 2026 · source

api

Audio request inspection shipped Extends threat detection to audio inputs, processing and logging audio traffic through the same guard pipeline with denoising and debug support. 4 releases · 3 other sources · first seen Sep 2026

release

  • Adds audio_payload flag in Guard audio requests to expose debugging information about the audio sample. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • TensorRT-LLM audio processing gains denoising support. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history
  • Audio requests now expose an audio_payload flag in the Guard API request for access to debugging information of the audio sample. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history
  • Gateway now logs requests to v2/guard/audio for monitoring purposes. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history

docs

  • Audio Defense screens audio input for prompt attacks and is available in Early Access. See Audio Defense . Defense against threats in images is coming soon; reach out if you want to join the early access beta. Early Access. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
  • Voice is becoming a common way to interact with AI applications, from contact centers and banking assistants to real-time voice agents. docs update · Sep 2026 · source

example

  • Inspect audio debug metadata when a Guard audio request is flagged, to understand why a sample was screened. curl -X POST https://<your-guard-host>/v2/guard/audio \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer <API_KEY>' \ -F 'audio_payload=@sample.wav' updated · seen Sep 2026 · source
Content moderation shipped Detects harmful content categories in AI traffic and lets operators adjust sensitivity thresholds or override decisions with allow/deny lists. 2 releases · 4 other sources · first seen Aug 2026

Also counts toward: ML-based detection

release

  • Adds weapons detector (firearms, bombs, missiles, bladed weapons, other personal weapons) and crime detector as new Content Moderation detectors. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • New self-harm sub-category added to the content moderator detector. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history

docs

  • This means if any of the content moderation detectors (crime, hate speech, profanity, self-harm, sexual content, violence and weapons) identifies something that looks suspiciously like a violation in the user’s input or the chatbot’s output, it will trigger a Enforce mode seen Aug 2026 · source
  • Allow and deny lists provide a mechanism to quickly override Check Point AI Guardrails’ decisions. These lists operate using fuzzy match patterns and do not modify the underlying model behavior. : Override any detector decisions for specific content using near-exact matching patterns. docs update · Aug 2026 · source
  • . This sets the confidence threshold level at which the guardrail detectors will treat the request contents as a threat. to detect , and they either detect or don’t detect content, independent of the policy flagging sensitivity. docs update · Aug 2026 · source
  • detected = true means the detector will trigger when its confidence level is either - Creates an allow list that prevents content from being detected - Creates a deny list that forces content to be detected based detectors for content moderation or PII. seen Aug 2026 · source
Agentic and Pipeline Security 2 capabilities Lakera extends protection beyond single-turn chat to cover multi-step agentic workflows, including tool calls and developer-role messages. It also discovers and inventories AI agents and their dependencies across platforms to give operators a risk-rated view of their agentic estate.
Agentic pipeline coverage shipped Evaluates content produced during agentic turns and tool calls, and flags tool calls that are inconsistent with what the user actually asked for. 2 releases · 10 other sources · first seen Aug 2026

release

  • Adds support for developer and tool roles for messages in the API to cover agentic and tool-using use cases. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • Expands API coverage to include tool role and tool_calls to better support agentic workflows. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history

docs 9 total

  • Skip to navigation runtime, and it returns the result your agent should use: your tool’s own result while tracing, or potentially a poisoned one during a tool response poisoning scan. You get a result back in the same shape — string, number, boolean, null, array, or object. docs update · Oct 2026 · source
  • - detect dangerous actions outside the agent’s trusted mandate with the Dangerous Deviation detector, and control which tools an agent may call with the Tool Allow/Deny List seen Sep 2026 · source
  • The Dangerous Deviation detector (beta) Dangerous Deviation detector The Dangerous Deviation detector, currently in beta, detects dangerous actions outside the agent’s trusted mandate, whatever the cause: manipulation, hallucination, or overreach. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
  • - Detect dangerous actions outside the agent’s trusted mandate with the Dangerous Deviation detector, and control which tools an agent may call at runtime with the Tool Allow/Deny List. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
  • Dangerous Deviation : with conversation history on one topic, confirm a dangerous tool call that the conversation does not warrant is detected with reason text, and that a warranted tool call is not. See seen Sep 2026 · source
  • For agent-specific runtime controls — the Dangerous Deviation detector and the runtime Tool Allow/Deny List — see seen Sep 2026 · source

example

  • Cover agentic pipelines by sending tool-role messages so Lakera evaluates content produced by tool calls, not just end-user turns. curl -X POST https://api.lakera.ai/v1/guard \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer $LAKERA_GUARD_API_KEY' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"messages": [{"role": "developer", "content": "You are a… updated · seen Jul 2026 · source
AI Agent Security shipped Discovers AI agents, their tools, and connected MCP servers across cloud and no-code platforms, assigns each a risk rating, and maps findings to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS. 3 releases · 2 other sources · first seen Oct 2026

release

  • New AI Agent Security (Early Access) product extends AI Guardrails with discovery and risk assessment for agents your organization builds and deploys. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • New product: AI Agent Security (Early Access) — discovers and inventories agents, their tools, and connected MCP servers across Amazon Bedrock, Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, Google Cloud, Microsoft Copilot Studio, Salesforce Agentforce, n8n, and Relevance AI. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history
  • AI Agent Security provides per-agent risk ratings (Critical / High / Medium / Low) with contributing factors, plus a risk-types view mapped to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history

docs

  • Skip to navigation Red organizes attacks into three main categories. A basic scan in the dashboard includes include, but are not limited to, Prompt Injection, Jailbreaks, Multi-lingual, Multi-turn, and Indirect techniques. Indirect attacks reach the agent through content it loads rather than through a user message. docs update · Oct 2026 · source
  • Risk severity Agent risk severity answers one question: how close is this finding to a realizable loss event, and how large is that loss if it happens? We assess every risk against four factors: Impact : The blast radius if the condition is exploited. seen Aug 2026 · source
Policy and Guardrail Management 2 capabilities Operators can create, configure, and audit guardrails and content policies through a management interface without writing code. A policy impact simulator lets them preview how a configuration change would have affected real historical traffic before rolling it out.
Guardrail and policy management verified Lets operators build and adjust guardrails — covering prompt defense, data leakage, content moderation, and more — and switch between flagging and blocking modes per project without code changes. 6 releases · 23 other sources · first seen Aug 2026

Also counts toward: Web management console

release

  • Adds user-defined prompt Allow/Deny lists to customise detection behaviour, with Allow/Deny list detections shown in the Request Details page. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • Adds support for Portuguese language in Prompt Defense. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • Enhanced guardrails overview table with filtering functionality and a Policies column; guardrails page adds creator field and last edited by/at information. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • Adds Request Logging for self-hosted deployments suitable for monitoring solutions such as Elastic Stack. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • Guardrails overview table gains filtering functionality and a new Policies column; guardrail detail pages now show creator, last edited by/at, and Policies assigned fields. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history
  • Policy advanced settings redesigned with dedicated sections for Content Moderation, Data Leakage Prevention, Prompt Defense, and Unknown Links. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history

docs 20 total

  • : the Dangerous Deviation detector and the runtime Tool Allow/Deny List docs update · Sep 2026 · source
  • endpoint screens agent interactions as well as user and LLM messages. Prompt attacks arriving through tool responses and tool descriptions, data leakage in tool calls, dangerous actions outside the agent’s trusted mandate, and calls to denied tools are all screened according to your policy. See seen Sep 2026 · source
  • Agent Behavior Defense: Dangerous Deviation detection and Tool Allow/Deny List Prompt Defense across inputs, tool responses, and tool descriptions; Dangerous Deviation detection Dangerous Deviation detection; Tool Allow/Deny List Dangerous Deviation detection and tool controls Dangerous Deviation detection and tool… docs update · Sep 2026 · source
  • Then, set up the AI Guardrails container via the environment variables: $ export POLICY_BUCKET_NAME = Name of the bucket, e.g. policies $ export POLICY_ENDPOINT_URL = S3 URL including region, e.g. https://s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com $ export POLICY_PREFIX = Path to the policy within the bucket, e.g. docs update · Sep 2026 · source
  • Public, routable IP addresses are flagged at a high confidence level . Private and internal-use addresses — RFC 1918 private ranges (e.g. 10.0.0.0/8 192.168.0.0/16 ), carrier-grade NAT, unique local addresses, and documentation ranges (e.g. seen Sep 2026 · source
  • leakage and dangerous deviations, and block calls to tools outside an allow list. seen Sep 2026 · source

example

  • Scrape the Guard telemetry endpoint from a Prometheus-compatible monitoring stack to track self-hosted request throughput and model latency. curl http://<your-guard-host>/metrics updated · seen Sep 2026 · source

api

Policy Impact Simulator shipped Shows how a proposed policy change would have affected past traffic, including flagging-rate shifts and category breakdowns, so operators can validate changes before applying them. 2 releases · 1 other source

release

  • New Policy Impact Simulator in the Dashboard shows how different sensitivity levels and guardrail configurations would have affected historical traffic. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • New Policy Impact Simulator on the dashboard shows how different sensitivity levels and guardrail configurations would have affected historical traffic, with flagging-rate comparisons across L1–L4 and category-level breakdowns. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history

example

  • Before tightening a policy, use the Policy Impact Simulator to preview how many historical requests would have been flagged at each sensitivity level. In the dashboard, navigate to Policies > select a policy > Policy Impact Simulator. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source
Observability and Continuous Improvement 1 capability Lakera provides filterable logs of evaluated traffic with tools to share and review individual decisions. Operators can submit bulk misclassification feedback to improve detector accuracy over time.
Logs and misclassification feedback shipped Gives operators a searchable, shareable log of traffic decisions and lets them flag misclassified entries in bulk to feed back into detector improvement. 3 releases · 2 other sources · first seen Oct 2026

release

  • Enhanced SaaS Requests page adds filtering and ordering of columns, request_id field, and shareable URL-based filter views. updated · seen Sep 2026 · source · release history
  • Logs page adds a Link button for shareable navigation with or without current filters. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history
  • Misclassification submissions now support bulk operations across multiple logs. updated · seen Jul 2026 · source · release history

docs

  • Skip to navigation Finding a request by its request UUID Every response includes a request_uuid in its metadata " metadata " { " request_uuid " " 9120508a-3a9c-4656-916d-b0220539832b " } You can use this ID to find the request in the dashboard in either of two ways: Open the Log Details page directly at… Dashboard filters for time range and project docs update · Oct 2026 · source
  • , which allows you to analyze the data even when Enforce mode is disabled. Under the Project mode column, all the logs contain information about the mode configured at the time they were screened. Threats tab seen Aug 2026 · source
Other 1 capability
Request latency analytics shipped Displays a percentile latency chart (p25, p50, p75, p95) for Guard API requests over time on the Analytics page, with hover-to-inspect and per-percentile show/hide controls, so operators can identify tail-latency regressions after deployments or traffic spikes. 2 releases · 2 other sources · first seen Oct 2026

release

  • Lakera's Analytics page now shows a request latency percentiles chart plotting the 25th, 50th (median), 75th, and 95th percentile latency of Guard API requests over time, with hover-to-inspect per time bucket and click-to-toggle per percentile.⁠︀︄︇︀︅︉︀︅︀︀︃︀︀︅︅︀︅︊︀︄︆︀︃︄⁠ changelog · Oct 2026 · source · release history
  • Adds a request latency percentiles chart to the Analytics page, plotting p25, p50 (median), p75, and p95 latency of Guard API requests over time, with hover-to-inspect and per-percentile show/hide controls.⁠︀︄︇︀︅︉︀︅︀︀︃︀︀︅︅︀︅︊︀︄︆︀︃︄⁠ updated · seen Oct 2026 · source · release history

example

  • Spot tail-latency spikes in Guard API traffic by checking p95 on the Analytics page. In the Lakera console, go to Analytics > Request Latency Percentiles. Hover over any point to read p25/p50/p75/p95 values for that time bucket. Click a legend entry (e.g. changelog · Oct 2026 · source
  • Identify tail-latency regressions in your Guard API traffic after a deployment or traffic spike. In the Lakera dashboard, go to Analytics > Request Latency Percentiles chart. Hover over a time bucket to read p25/p50/p75/p95 values, then click a legend entry (e.g. updated · seen Oct 2026 · source

Lines in monospace are the tool's own words: help text parsed from its source, or an endpoint from its API document. Under release, a line is our summary of a dated release. Under docs, it is quoted from the tool's own documentation or website. Each links back to the source it came from.

Command line

5 commands for Lakera, each with where it came from. This tool has no source analysis yet, so there is no option reference and no captured run beside them.

Source

Screenshots

From the release notes, newest first. Click one to see it full size.

docs update Oct 4, 2026

docs update Sep 18, 2026

docs update Sep 7, 2026

docs update Aug 31, 2026

docs update Aug 31, 2026

docs update Aug 17, 2026

docs update Aug 9, 2026

docs update Aug 9, 2026

Score card

  1. Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
  2. Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
  3. Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
  4. Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
  5. Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface

Five scores for Lakera, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.

Score cards are part of every paid plan.

See plans →

Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.

How this is scored
  • Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
  • Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
  • Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
  • Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
  • Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
  • Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
  • Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
  • Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.

Release-note detail over time

See how much detail Lakera puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.

Checking release-note history…

Explore the full chart →

Website history

lakera.ai, every change

Check Point / Lakera's home page and 6 more pages as they looked each month from December 2021 to October 2026: 20 renders, 4 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.

Website history is included with Researcher and Business.

See plans →

Coverage

Missing something? Tell us

What Lakera connects to, runs on and detects, read from its release notes and docs. So far: 1 new detection, 1 new vulnerability check.

Show

2 changes, tracked since Oct 5, 2026.

  • Oct 52026

    new Tool Response Poisoning indirect attack strategy

    Red's first indirect strategy, Tool Response Poisoning, delivers payloads through tool results.

    Source ↗

  • Oct 52026

    new 23 default scan objectives across Security, Safety, and Responsible categories

    Covers 23: security.instruction-override.1, security.system-prompt-extraction.1, security.tool-extraction.1, security.data-exfiltration.1, safety.hate-speech.1, safety.violence-extremism.1 and 17 more

    A basic scan covers 23 objectives: 4 Security, 8 Safety, and 11 Responsible.

    Source ↗

How we count

Read from 6 of 31 release notes and docs updates we hold for Lakera. "First seen" is the earliest note that names something; "last" is the latest. Our history may start partway through Lakera's life, so an old integration can show a recent first-seen date.

Each change counts once: "added 40 checks" is one line, so the numbers measure how often coverage moves, not how big the catalogue is or how well it detects.

Releases

Show
Coverage in all entries

31 entries

  1. October 20266
  2. September 202612
  3. August 202612
  4. July 20261
    Show
    Coverage in all entries

    31 entries

    Add the badge to your README

    Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.

    Tracked by Cyber Toolchain Choose a badge style and copy the code →
    browse all tools → score card for your toolchain →