Microsoft Security
2026-08-04-0378d1c4 commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Microsoft Security's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Microsoft Security is a comprehensive platform providing threat protection, vulnerability management, and security monitoring across devices, identities, and cloud environments.
In Defender Advanced Hunting, run a KQL query joining the MemoryUpdated field:
CloudAppEvents
| where ActionType == "MemoryUpdated"
| project Timestamp, AccountDisplayName, Application, RawEventData
| order by Timestamp desc
In Azure Portal Sentinel Analytics, create a Scheduled rule using the MemoryUpdated field:
CloudAppEvents
| where ActionType == "MemoryUpdated"
| where hourofday(Timestamp) !between (8 .. 18)
| summarize Count=count() by AccountDisplayName, bin(Timestamp, 1h)
| where Count > 0
SecurityEvents | adx("KustoCluster", "KustoDatabase", "KustoTable")
Summary
Microsoft Security is a commercial endpoint-security suite, sold under Microsoft's licensing rather than as a free tool, that coordinates detection, prevention, investigation, and response across endpoints, identities, email, and applications. It runs as a cloud service, pulling signals from separately licensed Microsoft products like Defender for Endpoint, Defender for Identity, and Defender for Cloud Apps into one console, so it suits security teams and SOCSOCA security operations center, the team or function that monitors threats, investigates alerts and coordinates incident response. Its work can be internal, outsourced or shared. analysts who already sit inside the Microsoft 365 or Azure estate rather than teams looking for a standalone scanner. Its documentation describes it as a unified enterprise defense suite rather than positioning it against a named competitor, placing it in the same space as other cross-signal detection-and-response platforms.
Microsoft Security is a comprehensive platform providing threat protection, vulnerability management, and security monitoring across devices, identities, and cloud environments.
How Microsoft Security helps
Which local AI agents and MCP servers are running on my managed devices without my knowledge?
scans managed Windows and macOS endpoints to discover 25+ types of local AI agents and MCP servers, and blocks runtime prompt-injection attempts against coding agents like GitHub Copilot CLI and Claude Code
Which of my cloud identities are behaving in ways that suggest compromise?
aggregates behavior, access patterns, and threat intelligence across accounts, sessions, and applications into a single explainable risk score and can trigger Conditional Access enforcement automatically
What is the full scope of an attack that has already landed in my environment?
stitches together signals from endpoint, identity, email, and cloud-app products to trace how the threat entered, what it touched, and how it is currently affecting the organization, then self-heals affected mailboxes, endpoints, and identities
Which of my AWS or Google Cloud resources are misconfigured or exposed?
checks roughly 90 additional AWS and Google Cloud resource types against 200+ security recommendations spanning cloud-native apps, identities, data services, and workloads
Can I trace an AI memory change back to the content that caused it and everything it later influenced?
ties audit events end-to-end from the source content through the memory write to its downstream effect on agent behavior, held under the same compliance boundaries as email and document data
Languages
Command line
1 command for Microsoft Security, each with where it came from. This tool has no source analysis yet, so there is no option reference and no captured run beside them.
No command matches.
Screenshots
From the release notes, newest first. Click one to see it full size.Media
Videos from the release notes, newest first. They play right here.Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Microsoft Security, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Microsoft Security puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Commercials
pricing & packaging history · Microsoft vendor page16 readings of Microsoft's pricing page since Mar 2022, with 3 relaunches of its plan lineup — each one dated, compared with the reading before it, and explained for someone buying the tool.
Pricing and packaging history is included with Researcher and Business. See how every vendor we track sells, and how that has changed over time, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Plans by offering
Each offering on the pricing page links to its own page of plans, read at its latest capture.
Plan relaunches
Plans, prices and descriptions are quoted from the vendor's own pricing page as we read it on each date. A plan missing from a later reading is shown as no longer listed on the page — a statement about the page, not the product. Readings that failed to show any plans are left out rather than read as a change.
Website history
microsoft.com, every changeMicrosoft's home page and 40 more pages as they looked each month from October 2021 to October 2026: 1520 renders, 335 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
18 entries
No entries match these filters.
- August 20261
- July 20264
- June 20263
- May 20261
- April 20261
- March 20261
- January 20261
- December 20251
- October 20251
- September 20251
- August 20251
- June 20251
- May 20251
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.