Microsoft Sentinel
August 2026 commercialThe section your link pointed to isn't on Microsoft Sentinel's page any more, so we've brought you to the top.
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEMSIEMSecurity information and event management, collecting logs from many systems and correlating events to find suspicious activity. Analysts use it to investigate alerts and incidents. and SOARSOARSecurity orchestration, automation and response, coordinating incident workflows across tools. Playbooks can gather evidence, assign work or carry out approved response actions. solution that collects, detects, investigates, and responds to security threats across an enterprise.
# After authoring your rule in BICEP, deploy it directly via CLI: az deployment group create \ --resource-group <your-rg> \ --template-file customDetectionRule.bicep \ --parameters workspaceName=<sentinel-workspace> ThreatIntelObjects | where ObjectType == 'threat-actor' | project Name, Description, Alias
Summary
Microsoft Sentinel is a commercial SIEM delivered as a cloud service on Azure, combining attack detection, threat visibility, hunting, and automated response into one workspace. It is aimed at SOCSOCA security operations center, the team or function that monitors threats, investigates alerts and coordinates incident response. Its work can be internal, outsourced or shared. analysts and incident responders who need to correlate alerts across identities, devices, and cloud data sources, using Kusto Query Language for hunting and UEBA to surface anomalous behavior from sources like Okta and GCP audit logs. Data connectors and analytics rules can be managed as code through GitHub or Azure DevOps pipelines, and it integrates with the Microsoft Defender portal for unified operations and with Microsoft Fabric for querying data in place without ingestion. Launched in 2019, it continues to see active development, with its most recent release 37 days ago.
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR solution that collects, detects, investigates, and responds to security threats across an enterprise.
How Microsoft Sentinel helps
Which of my users or entities are behaving differently from their normal pattern?
scores identity and entity activity against a learned behavioral baseline using UEBA, flagging anomalies like unusual logins or privileged actions across sources such as Okta and GCP audit logs
Which alerts across my identities, devices, and cloud services actually belong to the same attack?
correlates raw signals into a single incident, attaching entities and alert metadata so an analyst investigates one case instead of many disconnected alerts
Has anyone accessed a resource or performed an action they've never done before?
runs anomaly detections over audit log tables (Okta, GCP) and surfaces the specific unusual event with the entity and behavior that triggered it
Can I investigate suspicious activity without moving or copying my data out of its existing store?
queries data in place in Microsoft Fabric, Azure Data Lake Storage, and Azure Databricks using KQL, notebooks, and graph exploration, avoiding an ingestion step
Are my detection and automation rules consistent with what's checked into source control?
manages custom detection rules and connectors as code synced from GitHub or Azure DevOps, so a rule running in the workspace can be traced back to its committed definition
Which relationships between my identities, devices, and signals reveal a coverage or configuration gap?
provides a graph-based exploration tool that maps dependencies across entities so gaps in coverage or misconfigurations become visible as missing or weak connections
Languages
Screenshots
From the release notes, newest first. Click one to see it full size.Media
Videos from the release notes, newest first. They play right here.Score card
-
Shipping velocity releases a month, last 12 months
-
Documentation quality release-notes rubric, 0–100
-
Breaking-change discipline how rarely a release breaks users, and notice given
-
Maintenance risk quiet time against its own cadence, maintainers
-
Innovation & surface new capabilities, API and MCP surface
Five scores for Microsoft Sentinel, each built from the releases, notes and API history this site tracks — and, on Researcher and Business, where it stands among every measured tool in its category and how that has moved.
Score cards are part of every paid plan.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Trajectory
Blank means never measured; nothing here is a filled-in zero.
Peer standings are included with Researcher and Business. See how this tool ranks against its competitors, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans →Each score is 0–100 on a published rubric, derived from data this site already shows. A dimension we cannot measure says so — it is never scored 0 and never enters a rank.
How this is scored
- Shipping velocity — releases a month over the last 12 months, on a log scale where 16 a month scores 100. Needs 3 releases in the window.
- Documentation quality — the release-notes rubric published on the analytics page, unchanged.
- Breaking-change discipline — the share of releases carrying a breaking change (none scores 100, half or more scores 0). Only projects that label breaking changes are measured: a clean record cannot be told from an unlabelled one.
- Maintenance risk — quiet time measured against the tool's own release cadence (quiet longer than 90 days and three typical gaps scores 0), plus the number of active maintainers and whether contributors are growing, where known. Higher is lower risk.
- Innovation & surface — new capabilities in the feature ledger this year, API and MCP operations added, and the share of commits that are features: the mean of whichever we hold.
- Community health (open-source tools only) — each is a direction, not a size: contributors this year against last, the bus factor now against a year ago, and issues closed per issue opened, where steady scores 50, doubled 100 and halved 0; plus the median time to a maintainer's first reply (an hour scores about 100, a month or more 0). A commercial card has no repository and carries none of the four.
- Documented delivery (commercial tools) — when a vendor's documented new capabilities have slowed against its own baseline, that counts against the overall standing as heavily as two low dimensions. Steady delivery, or too little history to judge, leaves the standing alone; it is never a sixth score.
- Open-source tools are scored on repository signals; commercial tools on their published changelog. Ranks compare tools within one category and one profile and need at least five measured peers; the overall standing needs three ranked dimensions. Best-in-breed or consolidator is a shape, not a quality, and is never scored.
Release-note detail over time
See how much detail Microsoft Sentinel puts in its release notes, quarter by quarter, and compare it with tracked tools in the same category. This history uses up to ten retained, reviewed notes per tool; sparse or blank older quarters may reflect that limit.
Checking release-note history…
Commercials
pricing & packaging history · Microsoft vendor page16 readings of Microsoft's pricing page since Mar 2022, with 3 relaunches of its plan lineup — each one dated, compared with the reading before it, and explained for someone buying the tool.
Pricing and packaging history is included with Researcher and Business. See how every vendor we track sells, and how that has changed over time, using data we don't publish anywhere else.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Plans by offering
Each offering on the pricing page links to its own page of plans, read at its latest capture.
Plan relaunches
Plans, prices and descriptions are quoted from the vendor's own pricing page as we read it on each date. A plan missing from a later reading is shown as no longer listed on the page — a statement about the page, not the product. Readings that failed to show any plans are left out rather than read as a change.
Website history
microsoft.com, every changeMicrosoft's home page and 40 more pages as they looked each month from October 2021 to October 2026: 1520 renders, 335 changes of tagline or palette. Step through them, play them, or put any two months side by side.
Website history is included with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →← → or h l a month · Shift a year · [ ] previous / next change · Space play · 1 2 3 page · T whole page · C compare · F full size
← → or h l the right month · Shift the left · S swap · W wipe · T whole page · Esc back
Rebranding timeline
Dates bound when a change appeared between captures. Possible rebrands are AI suggestions; a redesign alone does not establish a rebrand.
Releases
16 entries
No entries match these filters.
- August 20261
- July 20262
- May 20261
- April 20261
- March 20261
- February 20261
- January 20261
- November 20251
- September 20252
- August 20251
- July 20251
- June 20251
- May 20251
- April 20251
Integrates with
Explore documented product relationships, workflows and source coverage. Documentary evidence does not confirm current support or your installation's fit.
- Microsoft Sentinel · Microsoft
| Provider product | Target product | Workflow | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlueVoyant MDR for Microsoft · Product without a Toolchain page | Microsoft Sentinel | managed security monitoring Direction not established · Availability unknown |
Source 1 not confirmed |
| ReliaQuest GreyMatter · Product without a Toolchain page | Microsoft Sentinel | threat detection, detection rule deployment Data flows out to the target · Availability unknown |
Source 1 not confirmed |
Threat coverage
Content for the last year of exploited CVEs and attack reports.Microsoft Sentinel has content for 488 of the 982 threats tracked in the last year, 5 of them exact.
See the threats, and how similar tools compare threat by threat, with Researcher and Business.
See plans → Already subscribed? Sign in →Threats with content
Compared with similar tools
Only Microsoft Sentinel covers
Peers cover, Microsoft Sentinel shows no content
Not indexed means we do not read this tool's content yet. It is not a gap.
Add the badge to your README
Maintain this project? The badge links readers straight to this page, so they can follow every release here.